1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48367.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Momentum Coupling to NEOs

Abstract: We considered the coupling of momentum to near-Earth objects (NEOs) for the purposes of collision avoidance or collision damage mitigation through trajectory modification. The momentum sources considered were pulsed lasers, kinetic energy impactors, and nuclear (or conventional) explosives, detonated above or below the surface of the NEO by the nonnuclear and nuclear momentum sources listed above. We did not address the system tradeoffs or the environmental implications of momentum source delivery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the NEO hazard mitigation index, values associated with C M must be experimentally determined on NEO‐like materials. This has been achieved,5–12 providing reliable values in terms of the magnitude of demands of a NEO mitigation mission. Nevertheless, heterogeneous NEOs increase difficulties in predicting dynamic effects from impulsive interactions.…”
Section: Uncertainties In Using CMmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the NEO hazard mitigation index, values associated with C M must be experimentally determined on NEO‐like materials. This has been achieved,5–12 providing reliable values in terms of the magnitude of demands of a NEO mitigation mission. Nevertheless, heterogeneous NEOs increase difficulties in predicting dynamic effects from impulsive interactions.…”
Section: Uncertainties In Using CMmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The energy to effect orbital perturbation depends on NEO mass, M , velocity change, dv , and momentum coupling coefficient, C M . C M depends on the interactants, intensity, method of delivery, and NEO material properties and physical configuration; it must be determined empirically 4–11…”
Section: The Hazard Awareness Level and Hazard Mitigation Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally speaking, to achieve a NEO threat reduction to Earth an amount of energy Δ E payload must be expended to change (perturb) the threatening NEO velocity by Δ V NEO ; that is, to deflect the NEO. The relationship8,10,11 may be written where M is the NEO mass and C (sec/m) is the so‐called momentum coupling coefficient, which depends on NEO material properties,21–24 that must be empirically determined for a range of targets, power, and interaction mechanisms 25. Delivery of the Δ V NEO can be carried out as a high energy density (power) interaction, where the momentum M Δ V NEO is impulsively coupled at the beginning of the mitigation operation or coupled slowly over a longer period of time.…”
Section: Neo Interception and Mitigation Mission Energy Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, the C M concept has not been well developed even though it is helpful for HED planetary, astronomical, and astrodynamic phenomena (inelastic) collisions where dissipative radiative and mechanical energy processes dominate. Up till recent work 4,8 applying C M to near-Earth object hazard mitigation was primarily relegated to the nuclear weapons testing community. We now apply the C M concept to HED physics, astrophysics and planetary science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%