1960
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.120.2041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Momentum Distribution of an Interacting Electron Gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
1

Year Published

1964
1964
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(J3) can be reduced from ∞ to some finite multiple of k F ;σ without considerably affecting the behaviour of ̺ h σ ( r − r ′ ); in fact, as we shall see below, the behaviour of the first two leading terms in the AS of this function for r − r ′ → ∞ is fully determined by the behaviour of n σ (k) for k in some infinitesimal neighbourhood of k F ;σ , the Fermi wavenumber pertaining to fermions with spin index σ. We note that, in the paramagnetic phase, n(k) as calculated within the framework of the random-phase approximation (RPA) also decays like 1/k 8 as k → ∞ (Daniel and Vosko 1960). On the other hand, this decay is like 1/k 4 according to the calculations by Belyakov (1961).…”
Section: Sin(qr) (F34)mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(J3) can be reduced from ∞ to some finite multiple of k F ;σ without considerably affecting the behaviour of ̺ h σ ( r − r ′ ); in fact, as we shall see below, the behaviour of the first two leading terms in the AS of this function for r − r ′ → ∞ is fully determined by the behaviour of n σ (k) for k in some infinitesimal neighbourhood of k F ;σ , the Fermi wavenumber pertaining to fermions with spin index σ. We note that, in the paramagnetic phase, n(k) as calculated within the framework of the random-phase approximation (RPA) also decays like 1/k 8 as k → ∞ (Daniel and Vosko 1960). On the other hand, this decay is like 1/k 4 according to the calculations by Belyakov (1961).…”
Section: Sin(qr) (F34)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Whereas this is not the case according to the RPA for n(k) as calculated by Daniel and Vosko (1960), the n(k) due to Belyakov (1961) has the following form in the vicinity of k = k F (see text following Eq. (A70) in Appendix A)…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…than v(E,,) is obtained for the homogeneous electron gas by noticing that the natural orbitals are in this case the plane wave states. Thus, the largest momentum that contributes to e,,, k,, is known from the momentum distribution, which has been obtained in the present approximation by Daniel and Vosko [33]. It is easily shown that in order to obtain E,, one only has to replace the integration limits in Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we do not consider b|rpa = −0.170157 as being the converged value. (88); the results presented here correspond to nσ(k) ≡ n rpa σ (k) [95]. One observes that, although for sufficiently small rs, α − σ and α + σ approach towards the same value ασ, in contrast with the finding by Daniel and Vosko [95] this value is not equal to approximately 1.7, a value to which α − σ and α + σ are indeed relatively close for 10 −4< ∼ rs < ∼ 1.…”
Section: The Case Whenmentioning
confidence: 97%