2018
DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2018.44.7.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Momentum, Mean-Reversion, and Social Media: Evidence from StockTwits and Twitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, research indicates that changes in Twitter sentiment lead to movements in share prices (Bollen et al , 2011). Thus, as share prices shift, market makers who rely on mean reversion are likely to remove liquidity by pulling out of the market, thereby triggering a self-reinforcing feedback loop where liquidity decreases further, leading to more significant price movements (Agrawal et al , 2018). Supporting the latter argument, Agrawal et al (2018) found that extreme sentiment movements lead to a higher demand for shares but a lower supply of liquidity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lastly, research indicates that changes in Twitter sentiment lead to movements in share prices (Bollen et al , 2011). Thus, as share prices shift, market makers who rely on mean reversion are likely to remove liquidity by pulling out of the market, thereby triggering a self-reinforcing feedback loop where liquidity decreases further, leading to more significant price movements (Agrawal et al , 2018). Supporting the latter argument, Agrawal et al (2018) found that extreme sentiment movements lead to a higher demand for shares but a lower supply of liquidity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, as share prices shift, market makers who rely on mean reversion are likely to remove liquidity by pulling out of the market, thereby triggering a self-reinforcing feedback loop where liquidity decreases further, leading to more significant price movements (Agrawal et al , 2018). Supporting the latter argument, Agrawal et al (2018) found that extreme sentiment movements lead to a higher demand for shares but a lower supply of liquidity. Therefore, shifts in Twitter sentiment may be leading to abnormal changes in the demand for shares, causing shifts in share prices and ultimately negatively affecting liquidity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Sprenger et al (2014) derived good and bad news from tweets related to the S&P 500 and found that this news has an impact on the market. Agrawal et al (2018) showed that extreme sentiment corresponds to higher demand for and lower supply of liquidity. Furthermore, they showed that negative sentiment has a larger effect on the demand and supply of liquidity than positive sentiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…available tweets contain valuable information that can be used to forecast stock market returns over and above the impact of asset pricing factors. Agrawal et al (2018) find that a sentiment index constructed based on social media, influences the supply and demand for liquidity in the stock market; they also find evidence supporting the capacity of social media to unveil insights above the respective insights of more traditional news feeds. By focusing on the global equity market, Beckers (2019) compares the predictive content of social media and traditional news to find that the information set delivered by the former is not different from the latter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%