2008
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2008.32625943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Momentum or Deceleration? Theoretical and Methodological Reflections on the Analysis of Organizational Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
90
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
90
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is line with organizational theorists who suggest that change processes, such as the initiation of foreign activities, only gain momentum once they have overcome initial inertial forces that inhibit the pursuance of new activities, but that change processes in general are governed by deceleration, which means that change suppresses further change. Thus since they are able to learn from experience and are motivated to leverage newly gained experience, firms will first refine and repeat activities they are familiar with before engaging in change again (Amburgey, Kelly, & Barnett, 1993;Beck, Brüderl, & Woywode, 2008).…”
Section: Experience and Internationalization Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is line with organizational theorists who suggest that change processes, such as the initiation of foreign activities, only gain momentum once they have overcome initial inertial forces that inhibit the pursuance of new activities, but that change processes in general are governed by deceleration, which means that change suppresses further change. Thus since they are able to learn from experience and are motivated to leverage newly gained experience, firms will first refine and repeat activities they are familiar with before engaging in change again (Amburgey, Kelly, & Barnett, 1993;Beck, Brüderl, & Woywode, 2008).…”
Section: Experience and Internationalization Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managers often display a bias toward action, in which they tend overwhelmingly to believe that there is an ever-increasingly positive relationship between exploration and performance gains (Peters and Waterman 1982). Organizations already accustomed to changing are more likely to change in the future (Beck et al 2008). In our study we suggest that this approach can be mistaken, especially when environmental changes increase in magnitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the concept of quantum changes -as featured by the attributes of corporate strategic changes set by definition stated abovecan be respected pro rata. Moreover, in this sense it is imperative to implement strategic changes relatively quickly to achieve better results (within two years, as the results start degrading when implementation of changes takes up to three years and even demonstrate the irrational propensity once these limits are exceeded; Miller, Friesen 1982;Kelly, Amburgey 1991;Jansen 2004;Beck, Bruderl 2008). Respectively, one of the essential tasks determining the purposeful management of corporate strategic changes is the objective evaluation of management measures and the results of their implementation.…”
Section: Climate Change and Corporate Strategic Changesmentioning
confidence: 97%