2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.110.156404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Momentum-Resolved Evolution of the Kondo Lattice into “Hidden Order” inURu2Si2

Abstract: We study, using high-resolution angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, the evolution of the electronic structure in URu2Si2 at the Γ, Z and X high-symmetry points from the high-temperature Kondo-screened regime to the low-temperature 'hidden-order' (HO) state. At all temperatures and symmetry points, we find structures resulting from the interaction between heavy and light bands, related to the Kondo lattice formation. At the X point, we directly measure a hybridization gap of 11 meV already open at temper… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
86
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
19
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This smallness of the lattice change implies that the hidden-order transition is driven by an electronic ordering, and small but finite electron-lattice coupling gives rise to the lattice distortion. It should be noted that in ironpnictides the large orthorhombicity is believed to be associated with the 'ferroic' (Q ¼ 0) orbital ordering, which is in sharp contrast to the URu 2 Si 2 case where the hidden order is most likely an antiferroic order with the wave vector Q ¼ (001) 6,7,[9][10][11][12] . Such an antiferroic ordering is expected to couple only weakly to the ferroic Q ¼ 0 orthorhombic distortion especially for high-rank multipole orders, in which the degree of local electronic distributions near the atoms are much smaller than that of dipoles in the antiferromagnetic case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This smallness of the lattice change implies that the hidden-order transition is driven by an electronic ordering, and small but finite electron-lattice coupling gives rise to the lattice distortion. It should be noted that in ironpnictides the large orthorhombicity is believed to be associated with the 'ferroic' (Q ¼ 0) orbital ordering, which is in sharp contrast to the URu 2 Si 2 case where the hidden order is most likely an antiferroic order with the wave vector Q ¼ (001) 6,7,[9][10][11][12] . Such an antiferroic ordering is expected to couple only weakly to the ferroic Q ¼ 0 orthorhombic distortion especially for high-rank multipole orders, in which the degree of local electronic distributions near the atoms are much smaller than that of dipoles in the antiferromagnetic case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…139 in the international tables for crystallography), which has 15 maximal non-isomorphic subgroups. Recent quantum oscillations 9 and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy [10][11][12] studies have revealed that the electronic structure in the hidden-order phase is similar to that of antiferromagneitc phase under pressure. This implies that in the hidden-order phase the Brillouin Zone is folded with the antiferroic wave vector Q ¼ (001) and the nested parts of Fermi surface are gapped as in the antiferromagnetic phase 13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is strongly suggestive of the opening of a partial gap at 25 K. The PCS measurements of Park et al [32] see a partial gap open below 27 K, also about 10 meV, but they do not see any sharp features at the hidden order transition, and it has been suggested [33] that this may be due to the pressure of the metal tip on the sample. ARPES measurements also see a gap open at the X-point in k-space below 25 K [24]. This gap has a value of approximately 10 meV and is well explained by a simple hybridization model, and furthermore, is associated with a different part of the Fermi surface than the hidden order gap.…”
Section: Philmag4mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Other techniques yield gaps that have a larger range of variation, in part due to the fact that their resolution is lower than what is common in optics. Both STM [21] and ARPES [22,24] also give gap values of about 4 meV as well as neutron scattering (around 4 meV) [45,50]. Other tunneling data include those of Escadero et al [51] who find ∆ = 5.85 meV.…”
Section: The Hidden Order Statementioning
confidence: 92%
“…From an electronic structure standpoint, angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) experiments detected Fermi-surface pockets at the G, Z and X points of the Brillouin zone in the PM state 8,14 . In addition, high-resolution ARPES and scanning tunnelling microscopy experiments demonstrated that a Fermi-surface instability of itinerant heavy quasi-particles takes place at the transition 14,[16][17][18]22 . However, a complete determination of the heavy-fermion Fermi-surface of URu 2 Si 2 , of its changes across the HO transition and a direct observation of the location and momentum dependence of the HO gap around the Fermi surface are still pressing unsolved questions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%