1976
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.36.326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Momentum-Transfer Dependence of theLII,IIIEdge of Mg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It does not imply the breakdown of the MND model in Li. It is true that the experiment of Ritsko et al for Li and that of Slusky et al (1976) for Mg tested negatively the prediction of Doniach et al (1971) that an edge peak would be observed, even in the K excitation spectrum, if the momentum transfer q of an incident electron were large enough to relax the selection rule. But Slusky et al (1979) showed later that in the case of Na, K, and Mg, the q dependence of the loss spectrum was not contradictory to the MND theory.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It does not imply the breakdown of the MND model in Li. It is true that the experiment of Ritsko et al for Li and that of Slusky et al (1976) for Mg tested negatively the prediction of Doniach et al (1971) that an edge peak would be observed, even in the K excitation spectrum, if the momentum transfer q of an incident electron were large enough to relax the selection rule. But Slusky et al (1979) showed later that in the case of Na, K, and Mg, the q dependence of the loss spectrum was not contradictory to the MND theory.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1 ' 2 In the simple metals Li, Be, Na, Mg, and Al the shapes of the observed threshold edges in both emission and absorption fail to exhibit the sharp step-function edges expected to be characteristic of free-electron metals. Instead, experimentally determined edges are either sharp and peaked at 6 E. R. Domb, T 0 Mihalisin, and J 0 Skalyo, Jr., Phys. Rev.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These theories predict threshold edges whose shapes are characterized by threshold exponents a 0 (for L 2t3 edges) and a 1 (for K edges); for photoemission the asymmetry of the line shape is characterized by 5 AE-OJ^, Serious objections have, however, been raised recently about the results of the many-body theory since the accepted values of the parameters in the theory produce threshold shapes that are either inconsistent with or different from the experimental data. Indeed, Slusky et al 6 have found that they cannot consistently describe their electron-energy-loss experiments on Mg assuming that the line shapes are caused exclusively by the Mahan-Nozi&res-de Dominicis effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the L II,III edges of Na, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Mg, 1,4,6,7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and Al, 1,4,6,7,11,12,[14][15][16][17]19,[21][22][23] as well as the M II,III edge of K, [24][25][26] are sharp but slightly peaked while the K edges of Li, 1,3,6,7,13,14,19,20,23,[27]...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%