2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-3377-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MOMO - multi-objective metabolic mixed integer optimization: application to yeast strain engineering

Abstract: Background: In this paper, we explore the concept of multi-objective optimization in the field of metabolic engineering when both continuous and integer decision variables are involved in the model. In particular, we propose a multi-objective model that may be used to suggest reaction deletions that maximize and/or minimize several functions simultaneously. The applications may include, among others, the concurrent maximization of a bioproduct and of biomass, or maximization of a bioproduct while minimizing th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The glucose uptake was set at 3.008, and the oxygen was at 5.703 mmol/gDCW/h . In the Yeast 5.0 model, the “Ferrocytochrome-c/oxygen oxidoreductase” (to a 0.10 flux), “Triose-phosphate isomerase” (to a −1000.6 flux), and glucose exchange (to a −10 flux) reactions were constrained in order to simulate the production of ethanol and glycerol during fermentation, as performed before . Each of the six synthetic pathways selected for LA production were examined for their performance, leading to the creation of six heterologous models derived from iJO1366 and from Yeast 5.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The glucose uptake was set at 3.008, and the oxygen was at 5.703 mmol/gDCW/h . In the Yeast 5.0 model, the “Ferrocytochrome-c/oxygen oxidoreductase” (to a 0.10 flux), “Triose-phosphate isomerase” (to a −1000.6 flux), and glucose exchange (to a −10 flux) reactions were constrained in order to simulate the production of ethanol and glycerol during fermentation, as performed before . Each of the six synthetic pathways selected for LA production were examined for their performance, leading to the creation of six heterologous models derived from iJO1366 and from Yeast 5.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 In the Yeast 5.0 model, the "Ferrocytochrome-c/oxygen oxidoreductase" (to a 0.10 flux), "Triose-phosphate isomerase" (to a −1000.6 flux), and glucose exchange (to a −10 flux) reactions were constrained in order to simulate the production of ethanol and glycerol during fermentation, as performed before. 57 Each of the six synthetic pathways selected for LA production were examined for their performance, leading to the creation of six heterologous models derived from iJO1366 and from Yeast 5.0. The reactions added to these heterologous models (all considered in the cytoplasm) and the resulting xml models are summarized in the Supporting Information (in Table S1 and in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is known as a Pareto front of optimal designs. Multi-objective optimization has been applied in metabolic engineering, for instance to kinetic models to find Pareto optimal reaction kinetics that maximize synthesis ( Sendín et al., 2006 ; Vera et al., 2003 ), and tools have been developed for use on GSMs to determine genetic manipulations to maximize growth and synthesis ( Andrade et al, 2020 ; Patané et al., 2019 ). Other tools have been developed to find growth-coupled designs ( Alter and Ebert, 2019 ; Feist et al., 2010 ; Ohno et al., 2014 ), yet there is no tool to determine optimal designs that maximize coupling strength, growth and synthesis, in order to create evolutionarily robust strains with high productivity and robust synthesis—critical for industrial application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation becomes more complex in simultaneous bioproducts optimization. A recent trend that works in metabolic analysis involves optimizing several objectives to engage in the study of more than one bioproduct of interest [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. In the past decade, this method can be traced back to the work of Zomorrodi and Maranas [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Budinich et al [ 21 ] extend FBA for microbial communities by defining a Multi-Objective FBA (MOFBA) in order to study multiple trade-offs between nutrients and growth rates. More recently, Andrade et al [ 22 ] and Pelt-KleinJan [ 23 ] proposes a multi-objective formulation of FBA that considers nutrient limitations for metabolic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%