2011
DOI: 10.5177/ntvt.2011.05.10287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mondgezondheidgerelateerde levenskwaliteit bij patiënten met terbeschikkingstelling

Abstract: Onderzoek en wetenschapOm de effecten van een nieuwe preventieve mondzorgbenadering voor patiënten met terbeschikkingstelling te bepalen werden 3 onderzoeken met een Nederlandse versie van de Oral Health Impact Profile-14 uitgevoerd. In het eerste onderzoek werd vastgesteld dat de psychometrische kenmerken van dit meetinstrument goed waren en dat aandacht voor mondverzorging een positieve bijdrage leverde aan de levenskwaliteit. Uit het tweede onderzoek met gebruikmaking van een verbeterde versie van het meeti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 40 male forensic psychiatric patients participated in this study; the mean age of the participants was 33.70 (SD = 6.40), with a range of 23 to 49 years. They constituted a random sample of the patients of the hospital, including patients with psychotic vulnerability (40%) and patients with personality disorders (60%) (Buunk-Werkhoven et.al., 2011a;Buunk-Werkhoven et al, 2010;Buunk-Werkhoven et al, 2011b).After providing the written informed consent, participants answered voluntarily a paper-and-pencil-questionnaire, which was based on previously validated scales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 40 male forensic psychiatric patients participated in this study; the mean age of the participants was 33.70 (SD = 6.40), with a range of 23 to 49 years. They constituted a random sample of the patients of the hospital, including patients with psychotic vulnerability (40%) and patients with personality disorders (60%) (Buunk-Werkhoven et.al., 2011a;Buunk-Werkhoven et al, 2010;Buunk-Werkhoven et al, 2011b).After providing the written informed consent, participants answered voluntarily a paper-and-pencil-questionnaire, which was based on previously validated scales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This OHIP-instrument consists of 14 items organized -the original order was shuffled-in seven dimensions of each two items, i.e., function limitation (Q4-Q14), physical pain (Q2-Q5), psychological discomfort (Q1-Q9), physical disability (Q12-Q10), psychological disability (Q13-Q8), social disability (Q7-Q3), and handicap (Q11-Q6). Responses were scored on a five-point Likert scale (i.e., 0 = never, 1 = sometimes, 2 = regularly, 3 = often,4 = very often)(Werkhoven et al, 2004;Buunk-Werkhoven et al, 2010;Buunk-Werkhoven et al, 2011b…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%