The Economics of Education 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815391-8.00019-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary and non-monetary incentives for educational attainment: design and effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that technology usage depends on technological incentives. This is because monetary incentives directly affect goal-setting, which is considered to be the main weapon in using technology to promote digital education (Napier, 2012;Schildberg-H€ orisch and Wagner, 2020). Technology has become a huge part of social integration in education, ICT literacy, information literacy, and the development of capacity for life-long learning and other skills necessary for the 21st-century workplace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that technology usage depends on technological incentives. This is because monetary incentives directly affect goal-setting, which is considered to be the main weapon in using technology to promote digital education (Napier, 2012;Schildberg-H€ orisch and Wagner, 2020). Technology has become a huge part of social integration in education, ICT literacy, information literacy, and the development of capacity for life-long learning and other skills necessary for the 21st-century workplace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a literature review provided direction to researchers to investigate whether technological incentives highly stimulate people while using technology or not. We chose this direction because monetary incentives directly affect goal-setting, which is considered a primary weapon in the process of using technology to promote digital education (Napier, 1986;Schildberg-H€ orisch and Wagner, 2020). Moreover, global science and technology development has reoriented fiscal policies to promote technological innovation and incentives to reconcile strategic objectives (Ding et al, 2008).…”
Section: Development Of Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-monetary incentives in the category granting rights and privileges are mostly non-tangible (although they might be given in the form of a voucher) and grant students privileges such as getting out of one homework assignment or having the privilege to go off campus during the school day. Incentives such as bonus points for the next exam also fall into this category, as they can be interpreted as a privilege to start the exam with a lead compared to others (Schildberg-hörisch et al, 2018). Non-monetary incentives are used to motivate teachers and boost performance has gained immense momentum in recent times.…”
Section: Tangible Non-monetary Incentives For Teachers and Student Ac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(AWUOR, 2022) "Financial incentives increase enrollment, also results effort provision and achievement". (Schildberg-hörisch et al, 2018) "There is correlation among the relationships among awarding incentive pay, teacher motivation, and student achievement". (Mckinney et al, 2000) "Student achievement improves significantly when teachers are offered financial incentives that reward this."…”
Section: Table 1: Monetary Incentives and Student Academic Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Other studies use exogenous 5 or endogenous 6 thresholds to be met in order to get paid. In relation to cash sensitivity, larger monetary rewards do not seem to produce greater effects on university students [ 14 ]. Contrary to Herranz-Zarzoso and Sabater-Grande [ 15 ] and Sabater-Grande et al [ 16 ] in which students' rewards were based on self-chosen-goals following a quadratic scoring rule, in this study we use a simpler incentive system, where students' earnings increase linearly with their scores.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%