2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.569322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary Model of Exchange Rate: Empirical Evidence from Malawi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model emerged as a prominent exchange rate model after the breakdown of the Bretton Woods System in 1973. However, the empirical evidence surrounding the monetary exchange rate model are often inconsistent and sometimes contradictory (Simwaka, 2004). As this model is developed based on the money demand foundation, the model is very much dependent on the assumption of a stable money demand function (Bissoondeeal et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model emerged as a prominent exchange rate model after the breakdown of the Bretton Woods System in 1973. However, the empirical evidence surrounding the monetary exchange rate model are often inconsistent and sometimes contradictory (Simwaka, 2004). As this model is developed based on the money demand foundation, the model is very much dependent on the assumption of a stable money demand function (Bissoondeeal et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of the Johansen cointegration test for the number of cointegrating equations has been endorsed by the ARDL bound testing approach in the case of all three exchange rates which proves that cointegration results are consistent with rigor and cointegration analysis is a reliable strategy to explain long run and short-run behavior of exchange rate as endorsed by (Simwaka, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In an academic investigation for Ukraine, (Boyko, 2002) where 'dollarization' was inducted, a modified version of flexible price monetary models has provided the evidence for exchange rate determination with a large impact on domestic nominal deposit (interest) rate, dollarization ratio, domestic money supply on nominal exchange rates in contrast to foreign fundamentals. The evidence from the research department of the Reserve Bank of Malawi successfully applied Johansen's cointegration on Malawi Kwacha-US dollar exchange rates and observed a valid relationship between unrestricted monetary models and the nominal exchange rates (Simwaka, 2004). A study regarding developing countries refused the validity of monetary models because of the insignificant effect of domestic money supply on the exchange rate determination (Jegajeevan, 2011).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is the difficulty of explaining and forecasting exchange rates based on macroeconomic fundamentals. Empirical tests of the models are often ambiguous and sometimes even contradictory (Simwaka 2004). The monetary model of exchange rates attempts to explain the exchange rate through macroeconomics fundamentals.…”
Section: Is Outhern African Business Review Volume 20 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%