Monetary Plurality in Local, Regional and Global Economies 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315272238-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary plurality in economic theory

Abstract: IRISSO). 1 We will concentrate on specifically economic theories of money, excluding approaches that are socioeconomic, sociological, anthropological and historical, as their use of empirical observation and methods of theorisation and analytical generalisation are appreciably different from those of economics in general.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, Corragio, Feliz and Ingham’s reflections focus on the crisis that the plurality of money reveals rather than on an analysis of the trueque or provincial currencies themselves. In this respect, their analysis reflects the tendency of neo‐Marxian and neo‐Chartalists to conceive monetary uniqueness as the norm, and its plurality as a symptom of crisis, as highlighted by Blanc et al () (see, for instance, Wray ; Aglietta and Orléan : 81, Orléan : 113–24; Fine and Lapavistas ). Historians, on the other hand, underline that money plurality can be found in a variety of non‐crisis contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, Corragio, Feliz and Ingham’s reflections focus on the crisis that the plurality of money reveals rather than on an analysis of the trueque or provincial currencies themselves. In this respect, their analysis reflects the tendency of neo‐Marxian and neo‐Chartalists to conceive monetary uniqueness as the norm, and its plurality as a symptom of crisis, as highlighted by Blanc et al () (see, for instance, Wray ; Aglietta and Orléan : 81, Orléan : 113–24; Fine and Lapavistas ). Historians, on the other hand, underline that money plurality can be found in a variety of non‐crisis contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Firstly, because the notion of an agreement presupposes some degree of consent, consciousness, or intentionality by its users, we argue it might not always be the case, particularly with the dominant "national" currencies, as we will explore further on. Secondly, because it overstates the exchange function of money, specifically over the unit of account function, that is more overreaching and sounder from a sociological, anthropological, and ecological standpoint [18,38]. More than a social technology that shapes social relationships and institutionalizes value [39], money should be taken as a language that creates commensurability and comparability among the different goods and services [14,40].…”
Section: An Ecological Ontology Of Moneymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When economists deal with the multiplicity of money in its theoretical dimension, they generally conceive this multiplicity as governed by competition. Lastly, theories that consider monetary plurality as a desirable monetary organization (as do Austrians like Mises or Hayek) still see competition between monies or currencies as the main driver of this plurality (Blanc et al, 2018).…”
Section: Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%