2006
DOI: 10.1080/00036840500369100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary policy and dividend growth in Germany: long-run structural modelling versus bounds testing approach

Abstract: This study examines the long-run relationship between monetary policy and dividend growth in Germany. For this purpose, cointegration is tested for between both variables in the period 1974 to 2003. However, problems related to spurious regression arise from the mixed order of integration of the series used, from mutual causation between the variables and from the lack of a long-run relationship among the variables of the model. These problems are addressed by applying the bounds testing approach to cointegrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this is a potentially relevant variable. It would, for example, be possible to combine the approach suggested here with the empirical model of Belke and Polleit (2006) who examine the long‐run relationship between dividend growth and monetary policy. Both studies seem to fit together like pieces in a puzzle because the activities of firms commonly called “dividend policy” analysed here are a disturbance in Belke and Polleit (2006) while the activities of central bankers which are usually called “monetary policy” are not observed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, this is a potentially relevant variable. It would, for example, be possible to combine the approach suggested here with the empirical model of Belke and Polleit (2006) who examine the long‐run relationship between dividend growth and monetary policy. Both studies seem to fit together like pieces in a puzzle because the activities of firms commonly called “dividend policy” analysed here are a disturbance in Belke and Polleit (2006) while the activities of central bankers which are usually called “monetary policy” are not observed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also could have used the ARDL approach. The main advantage of this method is that it is not necessary to a priori determine the order of integration of the examined time series (Bahmani‐Oskooee and Ng, 2002; Belke and Polleit, 2006). However, we are quite confident that all four variables in the model are I(1).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, this technique has been used in time series analyses in a number of fields (e.g. tourism: Saayman and Saayman, 2015; finance: Belke and Polleit, 2006); agriculture: Muchapondwa, 2009; energy: Narayan and Smyth, 2005). Third, the ARDL model takes a sufficient number of lags to appropriately represent the data-generating process and different variables can be assigned different lag-lengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monetary aggregate we use is M2 for the US, M3 for the which contain elements of misguided expectation formation. See Allan, Morris and Shin (2003), Gorton (2008) or, for a survey, Belke and Polleit (2006). 4 For a detailed discussion of the relevance of these arguments see Gros (2007), OECD (2005) and Shiller (2005).…”
Section: Empirical Analysis 41 Data Description and Aggregation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%