2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijber.20190805.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary Policy and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Evaluating the Policy Nexus in Nigeria

Abstract: While there are numerous studies on the relationship between monetary policy and economic growth, evaluating the policy nexus between the two phenomena remain inconclusive. Undeniably, monetary policy is believe to influence the employment level, price stability, growth of aggregate output and equilibrium in the balance of payment-for the case of developing economies. But the magnitude of its influence largely depends on how it is conducted through various channels and the independency of the apex bank to sele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the standard deviation of broad money supply (MS2 t ) business cycle, standard deviation of and real bilateral exchange rate Riyal‐USD (EX t ) business cycle, is calculated using the following formula: EX t = log (Riyal*US CPI/Saudi CPI). Both the real exchange rate (EX t ) and the real US interest rate (USR t ) are included as independent variables to capture the impact of monetary volatility on economic activity (Mallick and Sousa, 2009; Idris, 2019; Akalpler and Duhok, 2018; Timi, 2018; Tasos, 2019; and Daniel and Inim, 2020). The absence of data on local interest rate variable for the early 1970s and up to 1990s is due to the Islamic codes, and since the riyal is pegged to the US dollar, the internal rate follows the changes in the US interest rate (Adedeji, et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the standard deviation of broad money supply (MS2 t ) business cycle, standard deviation of and real bilateral exchange rate Riyal‐USD (EX t ) business cycle, is calculated using the following formula: EX t = log (Riyal*US CPI/Saudi CPI). Both the real exchange rate (EX t ) and the real US interest rate (USR t ) are included as independent variables to capture the impact of monetary volatility on economic activity (Mallick and Sousa, 2009; Idris, 2019; Akalpler and Duhok, 2018; Timi, 2018; Tasos, 2019; and Daniel and Inim, 2020). The absence of data on local interest rate variable for the early 1970s and up to 1990s is due to the Islamic codes, and since the riyal is pegged to the US dollar, the internal rate follows the changes in the US interest rate (Adedeji, et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the real exchange rate has a positive effect on real per‐capita GDP in the long run. In the same vein, Idris (2019) examined the relationship between monetary policy and economic growth in Nigeria from 1980 to 2017. His study used OLS and cointegration techniques whose results indicate a positive effect while showing that exchange rate and interest rate have a negative effect on economic growth.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Idris (2019) Measures of interest rate and liquidity ratio, on the other hand, had a negative but highly significant impact on economic growth.In addition, Engle-Granger co-integration test showed the existence of a long-run relationship between monetary policy and economic growth in Nigeria.…”
Section: Empirical Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers on how monetary policies affect economic activities in developing countries have diverse opinions. Many researchers believe that monetary policy significantly affects economic activities, while others believe it is unsuccessful to generate real economic activities as they assert that money and output have an insignificant association (Idris, 2019;Donkor et al, 2021). Given these conflicting and diverse perceptions, many researchers have given their opinions from different perspectives (Bernanke & Gertler, 1995;Zgambo & Chileshe, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%