Monetary Policy, Market Excesses and Financial Turmoil

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of whether and how monetary policy ease may lead to excesses in financial and real asset markets and ultimately result in financial dislocation. It presents evidence suggesting that periods when short-term interest rates have been persistently and significantly below what Taylor rules would prescribe are correlated with increases in asset prices, especially as regards housing, though no systematic effects are identified on equity markets. Significant asset price increases, however, can also occur when interest rates are in line with Taylor rules, associated with periods of financial deregulation and/or innovation. The paper argues that accommodating monetary policy over the period 2002-2005, in combination with rapid financial market innovation, would seem in retrospect to have been among the factors behind the run-up in asset prices and consequent financial imbalances-the (partial) unwinding of which helped trigger the 2007 financial market turmoil. Moreover, the paper points out that in certain situations policy rates may be a rather blunt tool for dealing with both the build-up and aftermath of financial imbalances, raising the question whether "macro-prudential" regulation could be useful.

The global credit boom: Challenges for macroeconomics and policy

“…25 Taylor (2007Taylor ( , 2009 makes this argument particularly forcefully. Ahrend et al (2008) also argue that a combination of loose monetary policy and nancial innovation account for the strong credit growth and rising asset prices in the mid-2000s. 26 The importance of perceptions of macroeconomic risk for the valuation of asset prices may have been underestimated.…”

The Present Dynamics of Financial Risks Related to Macroeconomic Policies in Oecd Countries, and Business Cycles

“…Therefore it should be forgotten this financial context is directly touch with directly banks and the other probably some financial crises because of the financial infrastructure come into being in the scope of the macro financial options, but except for public transactions as a the bigger criteria [1]. In OECD countries, this structural location related to financial crises have been in the controlling of developed countries like USA, Canada, France, Germany, Japan and United Kingdom that have largely financial liabilities in OECD group for a long time.…”

The productivity gap: Monetary policy, the subprime boom, and the post-2001 productivity surge

“…Ahrend, Cournède and Price 2008;Taylor 2009;Iacoviello and Neri 2011) have argued that the housing boom of 2002-2007 was encouraged by the Fed's monetary policy stance in the wake of the 2001 dot.com crash. That stance involved setting the federal funds rate target at levels that proved, in retrospect, too low.…”