2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2013.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary policy matters: Evidence from new shocks data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
201
5
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
13
201
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…9 In line with the previous analysis, I circumvent the problem of identifying US monetary policy shocks by using the time series of shocks constructed by Romer and Romer (2004), Sims and Zha (2006), Bernanke and Kuttner (2005), Barakchian and Crowe (2013), Smets and Wouters (2007), and financial market survey data of future monetary policy rates. 10,11 Specifically, the monetary policy shocks constructed by Romer and Romer (2004) are based on the seminal "narrative approach"; those from Sims and Zha (2006) are structural shocks implied by a non-recursively identified VAR model for the US economy; those from Bernanke and Kuttner (2005) as well as Barakchian and Crowe (2013) build on the difference between lagged futures and the actual values of the federal funds rate; the monetary policy shocks from Smets and Wouters (2007) are smoothed structural shocks from an estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model; finally, I construct shock time series based on the difference between lagged survey expectations of future short-term interest rates and their actual values using data from Consensus Economics or the Survey of Professional Forecasters. Consistent with the exposition in the previous sections, the US economy is represented by the unit with subscript i = 1.…”
Section: Global Spillovers From Us Monetary Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 In line with the previous analysis, I circumvent the problem of identifying US monetary policy shocks by using the time series of shocks constructed by Romer and Romer (2004), Sims and Zha (2006), Bernanke and Kuttner (2005), Barakchian and Crowe (2013), Smets and Wouters (2007), and financial market survey data of future monetary policy rates. 10,11 Specifically, the monetary policy shocks constructed by Romer and Romer (2004) are based on the seminal "narrative approach"; those from Sims and Zha (2006) are structural shocks implied by a non-recursively identified VAR model for the US economy; those from Bernanke and Kuttner (2005) as well as Barakchian and Crowe (2013) build on the difference between lagged futures and the actual values of the federal funds rate; the monetary policy shocks from Smets and Wouters (2007) are smoothed structural shocks from an estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model; finally, I construct shock time series based on the difference between lagged survey expectations of future short-term interest rates and their actual values using data from Consensus Economics or the Survey of Professional Forecasters. Consistent with the exposition in the previous sections, the US economy is represented by the unit with subscript i = 1.…”
Section: Global Spillovers From Us Monetary Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the baseline I pool the spillover estimates obtained from separate estimations of the twocountry VAR models and the GVAR model using monetary policy shock time series from Romer and Romer (2004), Bernanke and Kuttner (2005), Sims and Zha (2006), Barakchian and Crowe (2013), Smets and Wouters (2007), as well as financial market survey data of future monetary policy rates. Table 6 reports the regression results for each individual monetary policy shock time series.…”
Section: Individual Monetary Policy Shock Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I use the medium specification of their model, which includes twenty variables. 4 The third series of monetary shocks is taken from Barakchian and Crowe (2013). They build on Kuttner (2001) and compute the variation in the policy rate that was not expected by the markets, using different maturities on the futures contracts on the federal fund rate.…”
Section: Monetary Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Romer shocks (developed by Romer and Romer, 2004), the shocks identified from a recursive large VAR model (for which I use the estimates by Bańbura et al, 2010) and the shocks estimated from futures contracts on the federal funds rate (which I take from Barakchian and Crowe, 2013). The advantage of this comprehensive approach is that it avoids having to choose a single identification strategy, a choice which would prove hard given the limited consensus in the literature on which methodology is the best one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 See, among others, Nakamura and Steinsson (2013), Barakchian and Crowe (2013), Rogers et al (2014), Gertler and Karadi (2015), Hanson and Stein (2015), Gilchrist et al (2015), and Rogers et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%