2018
DOI: 10.11644/kiep.eaer.2018.22.4.353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary Policy Rule under Inflation Targeting in Mongolia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The GMM estimation is conducted for the total sample period (2007Q3-2019Q4), and also for the first half (2007Q3-2011Q4) and the second half (2012Q1-2019Q4) periods, since the whole period with an inflation targeting has two different phases as was described in Section 2: the first phase with economic disturbances and high inflation, and the second phase with moderate inflation and policy improvements. The breakpoint in the total sample is set at 2012Q1 following the previous study of Taguchi and Khishigjargal (2018), and this study also reconfirmed the breakpoint statistically by the Chow's breakpoint test: the F-statistic (7.166) rejected the hypothesis of parameter stability over different periods with the breakpoint being 2012Q1 with a probability of more than 99 percent.…”
Section: Gmm Estimationsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The GMM estimation is conducted for the total sample period (2007Q3-2019Q4), and also for the first half (2007Q3-2011Q4) and the second half (2012Q1-2019Q4) periods, since the whole period with an inflation targeting has two different phases as was described in Section 2: the first phase with economic disturbances and high inflation, and the second phase with moderate inflation and policy improvements. The breakpoint in the total sample is set at 2012Q1 following the previous study of Taguchi and Khishigjargal (2018), and this study also reconfirmed the breakpoint statistically by the Chow's breakpoint test: the F-statistic (7.166) rejected the hypothesis of parameter stability over different periods with the breakpoint being 2012Q1 with a probability of more than 99 percent.…”
Section: Gmm Estimationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Compared with the previous studies on the Mongolian monetary policy rule, this study and Taguchi and Khishigjargal (2018) commonly verifies an inflation-responsive rule, but it is in this study, not in Taguchi and Khishigjargal (2018), that the conformity to the Taylor principle is identified. This is probably due to this study's updating of the sample data by adding the period for 2018-2019 with the inflation being well-controlled under the improved management of an inflation targeting.…”
Section: Discussion On Estimation Outcomescontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the high interest rate in Mongolian financial market in recent times, it seems to be caused by the policy stance of the Mongolian monetary authority. Taguchi and Khishigjargal (2018) and Taguchi and Enkhbaatar (2019) argued that the high policy rate in Mongolia would reflect the fact that the Mongolian monetary authority has been suffering from so-called "fear of floating" proposed by Calvo and Reinhart (2002): the policy rate has been too sensitive to the balance-of-payment position and the fluctuation of exchange rate. In order to normalize the level of policy rate, they suggested that: Mongolian economy should have more foreign reserves to cope with foreign capital mobility; and from the long-term perspective, the economy should diversify manufacturing industries to maximize the advantage of currency depreciation in export side and to minimize its disadvantage in import side.…”
Section: Mongolia-specific Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%