“…We summarise in Table empirical studies on the proposed EAMU in a chronology that is consistent with Hegelian dialectics, notably: (i) a thesis on studies presenting a case for the monetary union (Mkenda, ; Bangaké, ; Asongu, ), (ii) an anti‐thesis on papers that have recommended against the common currency area (Buigut, ; Rusuhuzwa and Masson, ; Davoodi et al ., ; Mafusire and Brixiova, ; Lepetit et al ., ; Asongu, , ) and (iii) a synthesis for inquiries that have presented a case for the monetary zone, contingent on substantial policy efforts from candidate countries (Buigui and Valev, ; Falagiarda, ; Kishor and Ssozi, ; Sheik et al ., ). From an initial assessment, as with the case of the WAMU, we find that empirical results and corresponding recommendations differ by authors, periodicity, sampled countries and methodology.…”