2004
DOI: 10.1080/1350485042000225739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Money demand function: a heterogeneous panel application

Abstract: An aggregate data panel is constructed for the GCC's six countries and the cointegration hypothesis among the variables of the money demand function is verified using Pedroni's heterogeneous panel cointegration tests. The idiosyncratic, panel and group-mean cointegrating vectors are then estimated using FMOLS and a modified version of FMOLS developed by Pedroni. The idiosyncratic elasticities have the expected signs in general but are significant only in the case of the scale variable. However, when the power … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results reported in Table 3 suggest that in a majority of cases, V g and V p result in a rejection of the no cointegration null, which is consistent with the results obtained in these studies. On the other hand, for the Bahmani-Oskooee, Miteza and Nasir (2002), Harb (2004) and Jenkins and Snaith (2005) data sets, we see that the null hypothesis is usually not rejected, which do not agree with the results provided in these studies.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencecontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The results reported in Table 3 suggest that in a majority of cases, V g and V p result in a rejection of the no cointegration null, which is consistent with the results obtained in these studies. On the other hand, for the Bahmani-Oskooee, Miteza and Nasir (2002), Harb (2004) and Jenkins and Snaith (2005) data sets, we see that the null hypothesis is usually not rejected, which do not agree with the results provided in these studies.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencecontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Although many recent empirical studies on the demand for money have used country specific data and time series methods, a number of studies have also used panel data and panel estimation methods; Mark and Sul (2003), Valadkhani and Alauddin (2003), Harb (2004), Garcia-Hiernaux and Cerno (2006), Lee and Chang (2006), Fidrmuc (2009), Dreger et al (2007, Elbadawi andSchmidt-Hebbel (2007), Carrera (2008), Valadkhani (2008), Hamori and Hamori (2008), Hamori (2008), Rao and Kumar (2009b), Rao et al (2009) and Setzer and Wolff (2009 Dreger et al (2007) is high exceeding 1.7. We shall treat these two studies as exceptional to the findings of the majority of the panel data studies.…”
Section: Review Of Panel Data Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature which examines the demand for money in developing countries, using panel data techniques and incorporating modern time series methods (e.g., Harb, 2004;Carrera, 2008;Hamori, 2008;Valadkhani, 2008;Rao & Kumar, 2009), influences the conduct of this study. All the studies except Hamori (2008) were conducted for Asian countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%