2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00586.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Money, Marriage, and Children: Testing the Financial Expectations and Family Formation Theory

Abstract: Using data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Survey (N = 2,954), a birth cohort study, this work examines how gains in earnings and income are associated with marriage and subsequent childbearing for low‐income couples. Using change models, results indicate that positive changes in earnings, controlling for baseline levels of earnings, were associated with greater odds of marriage. Cohabiting couples who became poor were associated with a 37% decrease in marriage likelihood. Neither earnings nor in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
118
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
118
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The argument suggests that those with the fewest resources should be most likely to be partnered; this is not the pattern typically observed in straightforward comparisons (e.g., White and Rogers 2000) or in more sophisticated empirical analyses (e.g., Aassve 2003;Carlson et al 2004a;Clarkberg 1999;Gibson-Davis 2009;Goldscheider and Sassler 2006;Joshi et al 2009;Lichter et al 1992;Raley 1996;Sassler and Schoen 1999;Schneider 2011;Sweeney 2002;Thornton et al 1995;Xie et al 2003). The research on entries into unions in general (often treating marriage and cohabitation as competing risks) and research focusing specifically on entering cohabitation generally shows a weak relationship between economic resources on these transitions; when there are associations, men's resources seem more important than women's (e.g., Carlson et al 2004a;Clarkberg 1999;Goldscheider and Sassler 2006;Raley 1996).…”
Section: Effect Of Income On Transitions To Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The argument suggests that those with the fewest resources should be most likely to be partnered; this is not the pattern typically observed in straightforward comparisons (e.g., White and Rogers 2000) or in more sophisticated empirical analyses (e.g., Aassve 2003;Carlson et al 2004a;Clarkberg 1999;Gibson-Davis 2009;Goldscheider and Sassler 2006;Joshi et al 2009;Lichter et al 1992;Raley 1996;Sassler and Schoen 1999;Schneider 2011;Sweeney 2002;Thornton et al 1995;Xie et al 2003). The research on entries into unions in general (often treating marriage and cohabitation as competing risks) and research focusing specifically on entering cohabitation generally shows a weak relationship between economic resources on these transitions; when there are associations, men's resources seem more important than women's (e.g., Carlson et al 2004a;Clarkberg 1999;Goldscheider and Sassler 2006;Raley 1996).…”
Section: Effect Of Income On Transitions To Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Outros: Nessa categoria foram incluídos estudos que: (1) Explorou os motivos de confl itos conjugais e a frequência com que ocorrem nas relações conjugais (Mosmann & Falcke, 2011). Os resultados evidenciaram que um dos motivos mais frequentes de desentendimento entre o casal é o dinheiro (terceiro lugar); (2) Investigou os problemas conjugais comumente enfrentados por casais brasileiros (Miller et al, 2014) e foi verifi cado que o dinheiro, os fi lhos, o ciúme, o sexo e a família de origem são os motivos de confl ito elencados em ordem de frequência pelos casais; (3) Examinou se a melhora da renda estava associada ao casamento e à criação de fi lhos (Gibson-Davis, 2009). Os resultados confi rmaram a hipótese de que mudanças positivas na renda estão associadas à maior probabilidade de casamento; (4) Explorou a natureza da incerteza fi nanceira e como ela se manifesta nos casais casados ou em coabitação (Romo, 2014) e concluiu que os casais ressaltaram que em períodos de crise econômica a comunicação sobre como ambos percebem as fi nanças é muito importante para o enfrentamento de tais difi culdades.…”
Section: Etapaunclassified
“…Temuan dari penelitian ini relevan dengan program revitalisasi dan penguatan kesehatan mental keluarga, mengingat salah satu sumber konflik di dalam keluarga bersumber dari dominasi istri, baik disebabkan karena karakter personal maupun karena ketidakseimbangan penghasilan yang dimiliki oleh pasangan suami-istri (Gibson-Davis & Murry, 2009). Penguatan kesehatan mental dalam keluarga juga mencakup kemampuan untuk mengkomunikasikan perbedaan-perbedaan pandangan terkait interaksi kuasa dan pola relasi yang dibentuk dalam rumah tangga.…”
Section: I S K U S Iunclassified