2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-009-9156-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mongrel Gravity

Abstract: It was recognized almost from the original formulation of general relativity that the theory was incomplete because it dealt only with classical, rather than quantum, matter. What must be done in order to complete the theory has been a subject of considerable debate over the last century, and here I just mention a few of the various options that have been suggested for a quantum theory of gravity. The aim of what follows is twofold. First, I address worries about the consistency and physical plausibility of hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On sufficiently long timescales, no unitarily-evolving quantum state will remain macroscopically definite. 19 The Page-Geilker experiment has received some pushback in the philosophy literature, notably by Mattingly (2005Mattingly ( , 2009). Mattingly's objection is that Page and Geilker assume the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics (they do indeed mention it explicitly in their paper) and that their experiment does not have any implications for semiclassical gravity without this assumption.…”
Section: A Dynamical Equation Of the Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On sufficiently long timescales, no unitarily-evolving quantum state will remain macroscopically definite. 19 The Page-Geilker experiment has received some pushback in the philosophy literature, notably by Mattingly (2005Mattingly ( , 2009). Mattingly's objection is that Page and Geilker assume the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics (they do indeed mention it explicitly in their paper) and that their experiment does not have any implications for semiclassical gravity without this assumption.…”
Section: A Dynamical Equation Of the Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical position of each point on the world sheet is given by N numbers specifying the coordinates of the point, and these N quantities form N fields on the world sheet. Now, instead of thinking of a 27 See, e.g., Huggett & Callender (2001); Mattingly (2005Mattingly ( , 2006Mattingly ( , 2009; Wüthrich (2005). 28 GR treated in the framework of QFT is apparently perturbatively non-renormalisable, breaking down at energies approaching the Planck scale, and so cannot represent a theory of QG, if QG is required to describe physics at this scale.…”
Section: Gr 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this view is quite extended among the scientific community it is by no means universally accepted, due to the conceptual problems involved in the quantum description [39][40][41][42]. Also, the technical and conceptual difficulties encountered in quantum gravity have prompted a certain discussion regarding the necessity or not of treating gravity quantum mechanically [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%