The Proceedings of the Coastal Sediments 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1142/9789814355537_0048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MONITORING A DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITE ON THE CONTINENTAL SHELF USING THE DYNAMIC PENETROMETERNIMROD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a geotechnical classification of the sediment using the deceleration profiles and maximum values is justified (Stoll and Akal 1999;Stark and Wever 2009;Stark et al 2009). This can be confirmed by estimating an equivalent of quasi-static bearing capacity (Stark et al 2011) leading to similar trends (estimate of quasi-static bearing capacity for a constant penetration velocity of 2 cm s -1 : Rhône Delta 2.4-3.4 ± 0.5 kPa, Vidy Bay 0.9-1.3 ± 0.2 kPa). The higher sediment resistance in the Rhône Delta can be explained by silty sediments that were found in sediment cores retrieved at the same positions as the Nimrod deployments (averaged shear strength using a vane shear device ≈ 3.7 kPa), whereas in Vidy Bay fine sediments are expected (Pardos et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, a geotechnical classification of the sediment using the deceleration profiles and maximum values is justified (Stoll and Akal 1999;Stark and Wever 2009;Stark et al 2009). This can be confirmed by estimating an equivalent of quasi-static bearing capacity (Stark et al 2011) leading to similar trends (estimate of quasi-static bearing capacity for a constant penetration velocity of 2 cm s -1 : Rhône Delta 2.4-3.4 ± 0.5 kPa, Vidy Bay 0.9-1.3 ± 0.2 kPa). The higher sediment resistance in the Rhône Delta can be explained by silty sediments that were found in sediment cores retrieved at the same positions as the Nimrod deployments (averaged shear strength using a vane shear device ≈ 3.7 kPa), whereas in Vidy Bay fine sediments are expected (Pardos et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The impact velocity and the penetration depth were determined by single and double integration of the deceleration, respectively. Possible stratification and resulting top layer thickness was estimated from the deceleration profiles and double checked after consideration of changes in penetration velocity and penetration surface area (Stark et al 2011). The water depth was estimated by the MIR's on-board sensors, whereas the hydrostatic pressure corresponded to the results of Nimrod's pressure transducer at the starting point of the penetration process.…”
Section: Stark Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations