2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2021.151482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring and contamination incidence of gnotobiotic experiments performed in microisolator cages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were maintained in plastic film isolators (Metall+Plastik GmbH, Radolfzell-Stahringen, Germany) in a controlled environment and twelve-hour light/dark cycles. Hygiene monitoring according to standard operating procedures 70,71 confirmed that the mice were free of contaminants or infection with common murine pathogens throughout the experiment. GF mice (n = 3 males and 3 females per group) were removed from the breeding isolator at the age of five weeks and colonized with the corresponding OMM stocks, SPF microbiota, or left untreated (GF controls).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were maintained in plastic film isolators (Metall+Plastik GmbH, Radolfzell-Stahringen, Germany) in a controlled environment and twelve-hour light/dark cycles. Hygiene monitoring according to standard operating procedures 70,71 confirmed that the mice were free of contaminants or infection with common murine pathogens throughout the experiment. GF mice (n = 3 males and 3 females per group) were removed from the breeding isolator at the age of five weeks and colonized with the corresponding OMM stocks, SPF microbiota, or left untreated (GF controls).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…They were maintained in plastic film isolators (Metall+Plastik GmbH, Radolfzell-Stahringen, Germany) in a controlled environment and twelve-hour light/dark cycles. Hygiene monitoring according to standard operating procedures 70,71 confirmed that the mice were free of contaminants or infection with common murine pathogens throughout the experiment.…”
Section: Mouse Experiments With Oligo-mouse Microbiota (Omm)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Breeding colonies of animals colonized with defined microbial species are additionally screened by 16S rRNA-based microbe-specific qPCR and next-generation sequencing to confirm the presence of intentionally introduced microorganisms and to exclude the presence of unknown/unwanted contaminants. 65 Routine microbiological monitoring according to the FELASA recommendations 64 and recommendations for maintaining gnotobiotic colonies 66 did not reveal any evidence of infection with common murine pathogens in specific pathogen-free animals or contaminants in GF and gnotobiotic animals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several studies have shown that introduced microbes including viruses and bacteria can successfully colonize the gut of ASF-associated mice [23][24][25]. This implies that these mice are also highly susceptible to contamination by environmental bacteria and fungi [26], especially if aseptic condition in animal handling by scientists and animal caretakers is not strictly kept. Even though the ASF is widely used in biomedical research, individual bacterial species are not available in public strain collections, complicating the study-based modification of the consortium.…”
Section: Syncoms Representing Simplified Intestinal Microbiomementioning
confidence: 99%