Monitoring and Controlling Operations

Jones, Albert; Yih, Yuehwern; Wallace, Evan

doi:10.1002/9780470172339.ch65

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…MBOM comprises of list of all the materials along with their quantities required for a product to manufacture (Jones, et al, 2001) and is a different organization of EBOM which can be adapted for manufacturing purpose. As far as the structure of MBOM is concerned, it represents the hierarchical assembly groups based on the way they are assembled on shop floor (Chang, et al, 1997).…”

Section: Bill Of Materials (Bom)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The informal definition of MBOMi is based on our understanding of the MBOM concepts gained from the existing literature (Vollmann, 1997;Zhang, et al, 2010;Xu, et al, 2008;Tursi, et al, 2009;Jiao, et al, 2000;Chang, et al, 1997;Lee, et al, 2011;Jones, et al, 2001). The MBOMi is described as a list of items which are directly used in building a product assembly and does not include the indirect items such as oil, paint and tape.…”

Section: Mbomimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reference ontologies for interoperability across multiple assembly systems

Imran

Young

2015

International Journal of Production Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The role of information and communication technologies (ICTs) is crucial for future manufacturing organizations in order to support effective collaboration and information sharing. However the contemporary ICT based systems lack the required ability to adequately support interoperability across multiple domain systems. The capability of such ICT based systems to interoperate is impeded by the semantic conflicts arising from loosely defined meanings and intents of the participating system concepts. The aim of this paper is to investigate the interoperability of assembly systems at multiple levels of concept specializations using the concept of a formal reference ontology. Formal ontologies are providing a promising way to computationally capture the domain meanings which can subsequently provide a base to support interoperability across multiple systems and in our case multiple assembly systems. This paper takes the example of Manufacturing Bill of Materials (MBOM) concept and three different domain specific interpretations to explore and demonstrate the potential of formal reference ontologies to support interoperability.

show abstract

Section: Bill Of Materials (Bom)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mbomimentioning

confidence: 99%

Reference ontologies for interoperability across multiple assembly systems

Imran

Young

2015

International Journal of Production Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Your objective was to obtain a loan; while this is tangible, the service experience was intangible and either left you feeling served well or a feeling of mediocre or poor service; therefore, it is difficult to put some tangible quality measure to the service experience. As demonstrated by these examples, it is fairly evident that each of the industry sectors, while they appear different at a conceptual level, may be considered a complex system trying to utilize resources to maximize performance [1].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality Planning, Assurance and Control in Manufacturing, Industrial Projects and Services Environments

Siriram,

du Plessis

2024

Quality Control and Quality Assurance - Techniques and Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The role of quality planning, assurance and control is well established in manufacturing and production environments; however, the same cannot be said for industrial projects and the services environment. It is evident that the tangibility of the output is different and, as a result, evaluated differently. In a project environment, many projects exceed budget, schedule and performance. One may argue that quality planning, control and assurance have a significant role in ensuring projects meet their budget, schedule and performance objectives. In contrast, in a services environment, quality planning, assurance and control procedures are used to ensure that the set of quality criteria meets the customer’s requirements so that the customer gets a better service experience. There are differences in how quality planning, assurance and control are implemented and perceived in these three environments. This chapter explores the differences and similarities in the implementation, perception and maturity of quality planning, assurance and control. This chapter provides interesting opportunities for quality planning, assurance and control in a manufacturing, projects and services environment.

show abstract

An Operating System for Cloud Manufacturing (OSCM)

Santamaira,

Ferreira

2023

Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monitoring and Controlling Operations

Cited by 5 publications

References 40 publications

Reference ontologies for interoperability across multiple assembly systems

Reference ontologies for interoperability across multiple assembly systems

Quality Planning, Assurance and Control in Manufacturing, Industrial Projects and Services Environments

An Operating System for Cloud Manufacturing (OSCM)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About