Monitoring brownfield housing development: strengths and weaknesses of indicator based monitoring in the English planning system

Abstract

In England quantified targets for the reuse of brownfields and of existing buildings place particular requirements on the planning system as part of the overall strategy to make effective use of natural resources. Achieving these targets is not free of obstacles and potential conflicts. Therefore monitoring of policy implementation is a necessity in the planning system. In addition challenging targets for increased housing provision have been introduced. In view of this the dichotomy of adequate housing-land supply without compromising environmental quality must be addressed. As a consequence monitoring will play an increasingly important role. This paper explores how these challenges can be met. It draws upon practical experience across all planning tiers to highlight the potential and limitations of indicator based monitoring.

Developing an integrated approach for the strategic monitoring of regional spatial plans

“…Thus, spatial monitoring has two important features: firstly, to evaluate the success of policies and plans and, secondly, to predict future developments (Strubelt, 2004). The success of spatial plans depends on stakeholders' acceptance, which can be improved by monitoring, since it makes explicit the relationship between policy implementation and target attainment, demonstrating progress and the need for change (Ganser, 2008).…”

Brownfield redevelopment features: applying Fuzzy Delphi

“…In addition, some literature addresses the brownfield classification (Carlon et al, 2007;Klapperich, 2002). And literature addressing specific features such as: ownership (Adams et al, 2001), negotiation in pubic-private partnerships (Belniak, 2008;Yousefi et al, 2007;Chang and Sigman, 2007;Pfrang and Wittig, 2008), crime (Carroll and Eger III, 2006), employment (Howland, 2007), geographic information system and decision support system (Coffin, 2003;Thomas, 2003), housing (Dixon and Adams, 2008;Ganser, 2008), and land use (Page and Berger, 2006;Grissom et al, 2010).…”

The Evolution and Adaptive Governance of the 22@ Innovation District in Barcelona

“…However, these areas and assets still have important economic and societal potential, especially when they are located in strategic positions within the city [1]. Regenerating them may provide a concrete opportunity to promote and foster economic growth and generate employment, or to increase the housing stock and improve the quality of life of the citizens [2]. Urban regeneration aims at fostering a lasting improvement in the economic, social, physical and environmental condition of an urban area that has undergone a structural change [3].…”