2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring carbon assimilation in South America's tropical forests: Model specification and application to the Amazonian droughts of 2005 and 2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FPAR) is an important index for detecting the vegetation water, energy and carbon balance and is a key parameter in the ecosystem productivity model, crop yield model, and other models [1][2][3][4][5]. FPAR is most often defined as the proportion of available photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the green vegetation canopy in the specific spectrum of 400-700 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FPAR) is an important index for detecting the vegetation water, energy and carbon balance and is a key parameter in the ecosystem productivity model, crop yield model, and other models [1][2][3][4][5]. FPAR is most often defined as the proportion of available photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the green vegetation canopy in the specific spectrum of 400-700 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulated NPP in the central part of the Amazon is approximately 0.6~1.2 kg C m À2 yr À1 , which is smaller than the estimations derived from MODIS and IGBP data. It is also smaller than estimates about 1.15 kg C m À2 yr À1 in Senna et al [2009] and 1.273~1.350 kg C m À2 yr À1 in Nunes et al [2012]. This discrepancy is probably caused by insufficient precipitation in the Amazon simulated in BCC_CSM1.1.…”
Section: Geographical Distributionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It is also smaller than estimates about 1.15 kg C m −2 yr −1 in Senna et al [2009] and 1.273 ~ 1.350 kg C m −2 yr −1 in Nunes et al . []. This discrepancy is probably caused by insufficient precipitation in the Amazon simulated in BCC_CSM1.1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another uncertainty emerges in the both empirical-and process-based models when they link remotely sensed data with the field investigation. However, these empirical models usually have a relatively higher accuracy (Huang et al 2010), compare with the process models (Turner et al 2003(Turner et al , 2006Qin et al 2008;Nunes et al 2012). …”
Section: Uncertainties In Drought Monitoring By Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%