2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04712.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring cardiac output using the femoral and radial arterial pressure waveform

Abstract: SummaryThis study was performed to determine the interchangeability of femoral artery pressure and radial artery pressure measurements as the input for the PiCCO system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany). We studied 15 intensive care patients following cardiac surgery. Five‐second averages of the cardiac output derived from the femoral artery pressure (COfem) were compared to 5‐s averages derived from the radial artery pressure (COrad). One patient was excluded due to problems in the pattern recognitio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A PICCO+ ® system (Pulsion Medical System, Munich, Germany) was inserted to determine CO from both TD and PC in patients in whom hemodynamic monitoring was indicated according to our standard clinical practice. The arterial line was inserted in the radial artery [12]. Noninvasive bioreactance CO monitoring was obtained using the NICOM ® system (Cheetah Medical Inc., Portland, OR, USA) described previously [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A PICCO+ ® system (Pulsion Medical System, Munich, Germany) was inserted to determine CO from both TD and PC in patients in whom hemodynamic monitoring was indicated according to our standard clinical practice. The arterial line was inserted in the radial artery [12]. Noninvasive bioreactance CO monitoring was obtained using the NICOM ® system (Cheetah Medical Inc., Portland, OR, USA) described previously [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive catheterization is thus still required. For the PiCCO device both the radial and the femoral artery approach can be used [33]. A basic overview of the computation of pulse contour cardiac output is shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Pulse Contour Cardiac Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 -62 Pulse contour analysis has been found to be effective using both femoral and radial arterial catheters. 61 These devices have not been prospectively tested in burn patients. Other methods include measuring transesophageal echocardiography, 62 partial carbon dioxide rebreathing, 62 and impedance electrocardiography.…”
Section: Endpoints Of Resuscitationmentioning
confidence: 99%