2014
DOI: 10.4172/2329-9002.1000123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring Climate Change Impact on the Genetic Population Structure: The Case of the Fivebeard Rockling (Ciliata Mustela, Linnaeus, 1758) In Its Southern Limit of Distribution

Abstract: Ciliata mustela is a marine inshore fish which occurs from central Portugal to northeastern Norway. We studied the population structure of this species using cytochrome b gene and the first intron of the nuclear S7 ribosomal protein gene and samples ranging from central Portugal to Gullmars Fjord, Sweden. We tested the following alternative hypotheses: 1) is the Portuguese population of the fivebeard rockling self-sustainable? or 2) is this population dependent on migrants from the north? We found no detectabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another caveat is using only one mitochondrial and one nuclear marker in a day and age where next-generation sequencing producing thousands of markers are being increasingly used. This study is in line with previous research in the pursuit for patterns and processes involved in the phylogeography of the species from the North-East Atlantic (e.g., Bargelloni et al, 2005;Debes, Zachos & Hanel, 2008;Francisco et al, 2011;Robalo et al, 2013a). These previous studies used the same set of markers, allowing across species comparisons and multi-species approaches (e.g., Robalo et al, 2012;Robalo et al, 2013b;Francisco et al, 2014;Almada et al, 2017;Castilho et al, 2017) while revealing very distinct patterns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Another caveat is using only one mitochondrial and one nuclear marker in a day and age where next-generation sequencing producing thousands of markers are being increasingly used. This study is in line with previous research in the pursuit for patterns and processes involved in the phylogeography of the species from the North-East Atlantic (e.g., Bargelloni et al, 2005;Debes, Zachos & Hanel, 2008;Francisco et al, 2011;Robalo et al, 2013a). These previous studies used the same set of markers, allowing across species comparisons and multi-species approaches (e.g., Robalo et al, 2012;Robalo et al, 2013b;Francisco et al, 2014;Almada et al, 2017;Castilho et al, 2017) while revealing very distinct patterns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…While the present study used only one geographical location and two genetic markers, these apparent limitations allowed a rigorous comparison with data from several species collected in the same area over the past fifteen years and using the same two markers (mitochondrial control region and nuclear S7) (e.g., Domingues et al, 2006;Almada et al, 2012;Robalo et al, 2013;Francisco et al, 2014;Stefanni et al, 2015;Almada et al, 2017;Pappalardo et al, 2017), which facilitated comparison and calibration of genetic diversity results. Thus, it was possible to observe the high genetic diversity pattern found in several coastal fish populations in western Portugal (e.g., D. vulgaris (Stefanni et al, 2015) and Labrus bergylta (Almada et al, 2017)).…”
Section: Estimates Of Contemporary Effective Population Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last four decades, we have assembled extensive knowledge on the genetic characterization of marine organisms, mainly concerning the spatial distribution and structuring of populations (e.g., Knutsen et al, 2007;Plank et al, 2010;Robalo et al, 2013;Riginos et al, 2019;Verry et al, 2020). With this information, it is now possible and relevant to understand how these patterns behave through time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%