2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11119-017-9508-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germination using ultrahigh-resolution UAS images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This claim is supported by other studies in the literature that show the potential of UASbased photogrammetric approaches for crop growth monitoring and phenotyping. [33][34][35][36] Furthermore, UAS provides orders of magnitude increase in data collection efficiency at the field-scale relative to manual ground observation approaches. For example, the UAS-SfM approach can provide "plant level" crop height measurements across entire fields at daily intervals (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This claim is supported by other studies in the literature that show the potential of UASbased photogrammetric approaches for crop growth monitoring and phenotyping. [33][34][35][36] Furthermore, UAS provides orders of magnitude increase in data collection efficiency at the field-scale relative to manual ground observation approaches. For example, the UAS-SfM approach can provide "plant level" crop height measurements across entire fields at daily intervals (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, Fig. 1) Chen et al (2018). The accuracy of water detection at a large scale -using VHR RGB orthophotomaps -is high in comparison to Rokni et al (2014) and Jones (2015) (Tab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although calibration is usually required, there are a number of biophysical parameters that may be measured with less calibration, including certain variables related to phenology, growth, leaf area, height, and biomass traits, that in turn correlate with productivity and yields (Chen, Chu, Landivar, Yang, & Maeda, 2018;Dempewolf, Nagol, Hein, Thiel, & Zimmermann, 2017;Díaz-Varela et al, 2015;Granados, Bonnet, Hansen, & Schmidt, 2013;Swain, Thomson, & Jayasuriya, 2010;Torres-Sánchez, López-Granados, Serrano, Arquero, & Peña, 2015). By flying closer to the plant, MAVs and NAVs increase the possibilities for measuring previously unseen variables that are important for precision agriculture and phenotyping and, in doing so, further minimize calibration requirements.…”
Section: Flying Closer To the Target: Navs And Mavs Open New Opportunmentioning
confidence: 99%