2012
DOI: 10.4103/0974-777x.96778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring data quality in syndromic surveillance: Learnings from a resource limited setting

Abstract: Background:India is in the process of integrating all disease surveillance systems with the support of a World Bank funded program called the Integrated Disease Surveillance System. In this context the objective of the study was to evaluate the components of the Orissa Multi Disease Surveillance System.Materials and Methods:Multistage sampling was carried out, starting with four districts, followed by sequentially sampling two blocks; and in each block, two sectors and two health sub-centers were selected, all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Questionnaire surveys were reported in 10 papers [22,30,34,40,42,45,58,60,67,70]. Interviews were conducted in 3 studies [34,50,70].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Questionnaire surveys were reported in 10 papers [22,30,34,40,42,45,58,60,67,70]. Interviews were conducted in 3 studies [34,50,70].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlational analyses by zero-order Pearson correlation coefficients Implicitly focused. The chosen sample size and the precision of the results were dictated by logistical and financial considerationsVenkatarao et al 2012 [22]Accuracy of case detection, data recording, data compilation, data transmissionQuantitative method by using a 4-stage sampling method to conduct field survey (questionnaire) during May-June 2005 among 178 subjectsQuestionnaires of 2 study instruments: the first focused on the components of disease surveillance; the second assessed the ability of the study subject in identifying cases through a syndromic approachDescriptive statistics analysisAssessment from user’s viewpoint.Implicitly focused. Lack of field verification of data collection processWHO DQA 2003 [42]Quality questions checklist, quality index Five components: recording practices, storing/reporting practices, monitoring and evaluation, denominators, system design (the receipt, processing, storage and tabulation of the reported data)Quantitative and qualitative method using questionnaire checklists for each level (three levels: national, district, health unit level) of the system including 45, 38, 31 questions respectivelyQuestionnaires and discussions.…”
Section: Table A1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study demonstrates the need for quality surveillance data obtained by health authorities, which is crucial for the modelling of infectious diseases. There are several factors that are essential for the quality of data, which include an efficient surveillance system, laboratory diagnostic capacity, and data reporting and management systems [ 49 ]. The capacity to make forecasts in this study is a result of the available data quality by the MOH Malaysia, as there is a comprehensive infectious disease surveillance system in Malaysia, which includes the eNotifikasi web-based infectious disease reporting system, which is mandated under The Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act 1988, which provides an effective system that ensures the collection of quality data [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the MOPBASSS reporting pilot, problems were noted with the use of several case definitions, including “prolonged fever,” which gave a lower than expected yield when compared with malaria notifications through the NHIS. Whereas establishing a functional weekly reporting system was the main priority for the pilot, diagnostic accuracy and appropriate use of case definitions can be strengthened through training ( 30 ) and should be an area of ongoing focus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%