2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring DNA damage in indigenous blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) sampled from coastal sites in Denmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, we are not able to detect any genotoxic effect with both parameters (% DNA in tail and TME) measured with comet assay after exposure of mussels to contaminated Dessau sediment. In mussels, DNA damage is often measured in hemocytes (e.g., Binelli et al 2007;Riva et al 2007), although gills have been shown to detect genotoxic responses with greater sensitivity (Rank et al 2005). Indeed, at the beginning of our study, background DNA damage in D. polymorpha and D. bugensis was approximately 12% and 28% DNA in the tail, respectively, which is already relatively high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Nonetheless, we are not able to detect any genotoxic effect with both parameters (% DNA in tail and TME) measured with comet assay after exposure of mussels to contaminated Dessau sediment. In mussels, DNA damage is often measured in hemocytes (e.g., Binelli et al 2007;Riva et al 2007), although gills have been shown to detect genotoxic responses with greater sensitivity (Rank et al 2005). Indeed, at the beginning of our study, background DNA damage in D. polymorpha and D. bugensis was approximately 12% and 28% DNA in the tail, respectively, which is already relatively high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The genotoxicity assessment in marine and freshwater invertebrates using the assay has been reviewed (Cotelle and Ferard 1999;Lee and Steinert 2003;Mitchelmore and Chipman 1998a). Cells from hemolymph, embryos, gills, digestive glands, and coelomocytes from mussels (Mytilus edulis; Rank et al 2005), zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha), clams (Mya arenaria), and polychaetes (Nereis virens) have been used for ecogenotoxicity studies using the Comet assay. DNA damage has also been assessed in earthworms (Salagovic et al 1996;Rajaguru et al 2003) and fruit fly, Drosophila, (Bilbao et al 2002;Mukhopadhyay et al 2004).…”
Section: Invertebratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sentinel species are adversely affected by pollution in the water bodies and thus provide the potential for environmental biomonitoring. The Comet assay in mussels can be used to detect a reduction in water quality caused by chemical pollution (Frenzilli et al 2001;Jha et al 2005;Rank et al 2005;Steinert et al 1998 Large et al 2002) and oil spills with petroleum hydrocarbons (Hamouten et al 2002). However, the damage returned to normal levels after continued exposure to high dose (20 ppb-exposed diet) of B[a]P for 14 days.…”
Section: Comet Assay In Musselsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the body of evidence documenting these effects in vertebrates is high, there has been less attention given to the invertebrate species that occupy key ecological niches in marine habitats and for which genetic damage might have great potential for harm. The increasingly widespread aquatic distribution of chemicals with genotoxic potential has meant that the measurement of genotoxicity in the marine environment is fast becoming an area of great concern [3][4][5][6][7]. Sediments have long been recognised as a sink for organic contaminants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which by virtue of their hydrophobic nature can strongly adsorb onto sediments affecting the benthic community inhabiting them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%