1998
DOI: 10.1029/97jc03360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring ice thickness in Fram Strait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
227
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
33
227
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The model value of 1712 km 3 yr 21 is ;64% of the climatological value. The export of sea ice through Fram Strait has been fairly extensively examined (Vinje et al 1998;Kwok et al 2004), with the climatology value of 2300 km 3 yr 21 in good agreement with the 2598 km 3 yr 21 from the model. Accurate measurements of the freshwater fluxes through the Canadian Archipelago are more difficult to make owing to the remoteness and large area covered by this complex network of channels, leading to a wide range of estimates in the literature from 1700 to 3500 km 3 yr 21 .…”
Section: The Arctic Freshwater Budgetmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The model value of 1712 km 3 yr 21 is ;64% of the climatological value. The export of sea ice through Fram Strait has been fairly extensively examined (Vinje et al 1998;Kwok et al 2004), with the climatology value of 2300 km 3 yr 21 in good agreement with the 2598 km 3 yr 21 from the model. Accurate measurements of the freshwater fluxes through the Canadian Archipelago are more difficult to make owing to the remoteness and large area covered by this complex network of channels, leading to a wide range of estimates in the literature from 1700 to 3500 km 3 yr 21 .…”
Section: The Arctic Freshwater Budgetmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…We note that this on-shelf ice flux is similar to (about one-half) that estimated by Woodgate, Aagaard, Muench, Gunn, Björk, Rudels, Roach and Schauer (in press) for the Barents Sea in 1993-94. We note also that the 0.005 Sv on-shelf ice flux is only about 5% of the estimated ice transport southward through Fram Strait (Vinje, Nordlund and Kvambekk, 1998), and so the flux of ice onto the Barents shelf does not greatly affect estimates of total ice export from the Arctic Ocean. The heat flux needed to melt the ice is also small, only 1.6 x 10 12 W, whereas the temperature decrease in the Atlantic water transformation represents a much larger heat loss of 38 x 10 12 W. Therefore, on average, only about 4% of the oceanic heat loss represented by the transformation of Atlantic water on the shelf is used to melt ice.…”
Section: An Example: Transformation Of the Barents Sea Throughflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volume transport for the EGC is ϳ1 Sv for the upper 200 m (Burke et al 1987;Foldvik et al 1988), which we use to represent PSW export. An annual average of about 0.09 Sv of ice is exported through Fram Strait (Vinje et al 1998). Using an average DOC value of 80 M for the EGC and 107 M for ice (similar to average values measured in Arctic sea-ice cores; Thomas et al 1995), we estimate an annual export through the Fram Strait of 2.9-10.3 Tg terrigenous DOC in the upper 200 m of the EGC.…”
Section: Export Of Terrigenous Udom In Arcticmentioning
confidence: 99%