2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.08.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring methodologies and tools for the Sustainable Energy Action Plans to support the Public Administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SEAP monitoring involves specific implementation steps to optimally fulfill the activities envisaged for the preparation of the relative specific reports. A first qualitative (and partly quantitative) analysis was presented, for all the 108 municipalities, in a previous paper, [32], following these steps: a) SEAP check and online update: identify and analyze the situation as a reference state; b) Start monitoring phase: implementation, reporting and monitoring check-list for Municipalities; c) Data collection: from check-list with the state of implementation of the actions; d) Elaboration and loading data on official "Covenant of Mayors" website; e) "Intervention Report": quantitative framework for municipalities which summarizes the progresses. This paper analyzes from a qualitative point of view SEAP updating, quantifying the single consumptions for each energy sector, drafting a new MEI for a specific year: the data analysis revealed the state of the implementation of the actions in 2017, in order to have a global analysis of municipal state and interventions and to verify the correct planning process to the 2020 goal CO2 reduction of 20%.…”
Section: Seap Monitoring Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SEAP monitoring involves specific implementation steps to optimally fulfill the activities envisaged for the preparation of the relative specific reports. A first qualitative (and partly quantitative) analysis was presented, for all the 108 municipalities, in a previous paper, [32], following these steps: a) SEAP check and online update: identify and analyze the situation as a reference state; b) Start monitoring phase: implementation, reporting and monitoring check-list for Municipalities; c) Data collection: from check-list with the state of implementation of the actions; d) Elaboration and loading data on official "Covenant of Mayors" website; e) "Intervention Report": quantitative framework for municipalities which summarizes the progresses. This paper analyzes from a qualitative point of view SEAP updating, quantifying the single consumptions for each energy sector, drafting a new MEI for a specific year: the data analysis revealed the state of the implementation of the actions in 2017, in order to have a global analysis of municipal state and interventions and to verify the correct planning process to the 2020 goal CO2 reduction of 20%.…”
Section: Seap Monitoring Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if initially it was designed for large urban centres, the Covenant of Mayors did not place requirements on the size of the signatories: everyone can participate, from small municipalities to major metropolitan areas. Today the Covenant of Mayors, which became global in 2017, has over 7500 local and regional authorities active in 121 countries, which can take advantage of the strength of a multi-stakeholder movement worldwide and the technical and methodological support offered by various dedicated offices Therefore, in the regulatory context of local public administrations, in anticipation of adherence to the Covenant of Mayors, the paper seeks to show and to highlight possible operational variations on risk mitigation, in particular against floods, for the negotiation and development of insurance contracts [11].…”
Section: Secap and Covenant Of Mayors New Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies suggest that infrastructure resilience has a direct connection with the term resilience proposed by Holling and used in ecology [15]. This definition is generalized as the capacity of a system to absorb disturbances and to recover after a major disruption and to restart an activity on the territory [11].…”
Section: Concept Of Infrastructural Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations