2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18381-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring non-parametric profiles using adaptive EWMA control chart

Abstract: To monitor the quality of a process in statistical process control (SPC), considering a functional relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables (which is denoted as profile monitoring) is becoming an increasingly common approach. Most of the studies in the SPC literature considered parametric approaches in which the functional relationship has the same form in the in-control (IC) and out-of-control (OC) situations. Non-parametric profiles, which have a different functional re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a fundamental difference here with most of the existing researches in the area of profile monitoring such as Kang and Albin [ 26 ], Li and Wang [ 59 ], Mahmood, Riaz [ 60 ] and Abbasi, Yeganeh [ 61 ] as they have usually considered fixed (constant) explanatory variables in each profile (it means that the j index is omitted from Eq ( 1 ) in their approach). But this assumption is not valid in our problem since the BTC values are not constant in each day.…”
Section: The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a fundamental difference here with most of the existing researches in the area of profile monitoring such as Kang and Albin [ 26 ], Li and Wang [ 59 ], Mahmood, Riaz [ 60 ] and Abbasi, Yeganeh [ 61 ] as they have usually considered fixed (constant) explanatory variables in each profile (it means that the j index is omitted from Eq ( 1 ) in their approach). But this assumption is not valid in our problem since the BTC values are not constant in each day.…”
Section: The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also assessed the performance of the NPSR-DH chart by using the other measures of the RL such as (standard deviation of the RL (SDRL), a median of the RL (MDRL), and some percentile points of the RL ( )) because of the skewed behavior of the RL distribution (cf. Naveed et al 34 , Bataineh et al 35 and Shafqat et al 36 ). The RL measures are calculated through Monte Carlo simulations in R language.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although there are two main simultaneous monitoring schemes, one uses only one single chart and the other uses two charts, the former is preferred due to its simplicity of usage. Some notable works that have considered simultaneous monitoring of profiles parameters are Zhang et al 18 , Eyvazian et al 15 , Khedmati & Niaki 19 , Ghashghaei & Amiri 20 , 21 , Mahmood et al 22 , Saeed et al 23 , Ghashghaei et al 24 , Malela-Majika et al 25 , Abbasi et al 26 , Sabahno & Amiri 27 , and Sherwani et al 28 . Ghashghaei & Amiri 20 , developed two memory-type control charts by using a max-operator, namely Max-MEWMA (multivariate EWMA) and Max-MCUSUM (multivariate CUSUM) control charts for simultaneous monitoring of the mean vector and variance-covariance matrix of multivariate multiple linear profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%