2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of antibiotic consumption in livestock: A German feasibility study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
85
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
85
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…the intensity of use is much higher in calf production, especially veal calf production, than in other beef production systems and in dairy cattle. 15,16 Furthermore, the potency of the various antimicrobial agents within a class can be very different; e.g. the dosage of doxycycline is about one quarter of the dosage of oxytetracycline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the intensity of use is much higher in calf production, especially veal calf production, than in other beef production systems and in dairy cattle. 15,16 Furthermore, the potency of the various antimicrobial agents within a class can be very different; e.g. the dosage of doxycycline is about one quarter of the dosage of oxytetracycline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These programmes are responsible for the collection, analysis and publication of data on sales and consumption of antimicrobials in livestock and food animals [Chauvin et al 2008;Merle et al 2012;Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2015a,b]. Furthermore, there were no reported studies concerning the use and consumption of antimicrobials in the broiler production in Morocco.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the most appropriate antibacterial should be used. However, the decision to treat and choice of antibacterials may be affected by numerous factors other than professional veterinary knowledge (Busani et Antibacterials are usually administered to pigs (in particular weaners) per pen or section via feed or water, implying that healthy animals within the pens are also treated (Merle et al, 2012;Callens et al, 2012). However, oral administration appears to be a crucial factor in the risk of antibacterial resistance development (Burow et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%