Advancing Culture of Living With Landslides 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53485-5_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of Debris Flows with an Improved System Setup at the Lattenbach Catchment, Austria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the method for the discharge estimation is applied to the infrasound signal, the peak discharge is calculated as 41 m /s and the total volume as 13,430 m . At the Lattenbach monitoring site, a 2D Laser scanner can be used in combination with a debris flow Puls–Doppler Radar (IBTP-Koschuch, [ 42 ]) for surface velocity to calculate, with a good degree of accuracy, the discharge of debris flows with a time resolution of one second during the whole event duration [ 43 ]. Figure 13 compares the discharge and total volume estimate based on the infrasound signal to the measured discharge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the method for the discharge estimation is applied to the infrasound signal, the peak discharge is calculated as 41 m /s and the total volume as 13,430 m . At the Lattenbach monitoring site, a 2D Laser scanner can be used in combination with a debris flow Puls–Doppler Radar (IBTP-Koschuch, [ 42 ]) for surface velocity to calculate, with a good degree of accuracy, the discharge of debris flows with a time resolution of one second during the whole event duration [ 43 ]. Figure 13 compares the discharge and total volume estimate based on the infrasound signal to the measured discharge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon the knowledge of the author, nowadays in Europe debris-flow monitoring stations are only situated in the Alps: Italy (Berti et al, 2000;Marchi et al, 2002), Austria (Hübl and Kaitna, 2010), Switzerland (Badoux et al, 2009;Hürlimann et al, 2003b) and…”
Section: Debris Flow Monitoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one side, monitoring aims to gain knowledge about the flow behaviour, while on another, instrumentation seeks to detect the occurrence of events in order to alert the people exposed to the risk. According to the authors' knowledge, right now, in Europe, debris-flow monitoring stations are mostly located in the Alps: Italy (Berti et al, 2000;Marchi et al, 2002), Austria (Hübl and Kaitna, 2010), France (Navratil et al, 2012) and Switzerland (Badoux et al, 2009;Hürlimann et al, 2003b), but also in the Icelandic fjords (Bessason et al, 2007) or the Monitoring and geomorphologic characterization of debris flows at catchment scale [46] Spanish Pyrenees . There are other stations in China (Zhang, 1993), Japan (Lavigne et al, 2000;Suwa et al, 2009), Taiwan (Yin et al, 2010) and USA (Hadley and LaHusen, 1995;LaHusen, 2005a), as well as monitoring stations for other types of rapid mass movements, such as lahars (Lavigne et al, 2000;Marcial et al, 1996;Tuñgol and Regalado, 1996), bedload transport (Rickenmann and Fritschi, 2007;Rickenmann and McArdell, 2007) or avalanches (Leprettre et al, 1996) throughout the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%