“…Environmental DNA has been studied in different environments, including water (Ficetola et al, 2008; Knudsen et al, 2022; Stoeckle et al, 2021; Thomsen et al, 2012; Thomsen et al, 2016), air (Clare et al, 2022; Roger et al, 2022), and soil (Buxton et al, 2018; Ryan et al, 2022). Typically, it is used to assess the presence of either a single target species (Ficetola et al, 2008; Knudsen et al, 2022; Yates et al, 2021) or the composition of species from larger taxonomic groups, that is, biodiversity (Bakker et al, 2019; Boussarie et al, 2018; Hongo et al, 2021; Roger et al, 2022; Russo et al, 2021). Because eDNA allows for easier, cheaper, and faster species monitoring compared to the labor‐intensive traditional visual methods (Fediajevaite et al, 2021; Goldberg et al, 2013; Lugg et al, 2018; Thomsen et al, 2012), there is an ongoing effort to explore the potential of eDNA studies beyond species detection toward estimation of biomass and abundance (Russo et al, 2021; Stoeckle et al, 2021; Thomsen et al, 2012; Yates et al, 2021).…”