1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00280633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of fecal indicators in rivers on the basis of random sampling and percentiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of source, storm events clearly increased levels of indicator bacteria and Aeromonas throughout the watershed. Indicator bacteria rose approximately one log unit during storm events (Table 3) and this supports other findings that the level of indicator bacteria in fresh water may increase following rainfall (Culley & Phillips 1982; Niemi & Niemi 1990; Wyer et al . 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Regardless of source, storm events clearly increased levels of indicator bacteria and Aeromonas throughout the watershed. Indicator bacteria rose approximately one log unit during storm events (Table 3) and this supports other findings that the level of indicator bacteria in fresh water may increase following rainfall (Culley & Phillips 1982; Niemi & Niemi 1990; Wyer et al . 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%