Monitoring of Flow Assurance Solids in Oil and Gas Fields

Hussein, Abdullah

doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99118-6.00002-2

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…27 It is important to note that there are other ways of defining both Dm and s, with some definitions of s being given as approximations. 27,96,97 Additionally, the temperature can dictate the probability of overcoming an energy barrier and stability of the final crystal. By increasing temperatures, the thermal energy within the system increases, resulting in a greater driving force for crystallization, specifically of the thermodynamic product, to occur.…”

Section: Temperaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding and controlling the nucleation and growth of metal–organic frameworks

Carpenter,

Talosig,

Rose

et al. 2023

Chem. Soc. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Temperaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding and controlling the nucleation and growth of metal–organic frameworks

Carpenter,

Talosig,

Rose

et al. 2023

Chem. Soc. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, this specification has failed to take into consideration the fact that flowlines typically experience higher pressure drops due to frictional losses compared to risers [3,5]. Also, the erosional velocity limit adds another layer of complexity [3] and meeting this constraint at the design flow rate (14,000 STB/day) may force the selection of a larger diameter pipe than what would be strictly necessary for pressure management [17].…”

Section: Componentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Flow assurance analysis in Front End Engineering Design (FEED) of Subsea Flowline and Riser

Ipalibo Senibo George,

Charles U. Orji,

Ibiba E. Douglas

2024

World J. Adv. Res. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovative subsea production systems (SPS) are required for deep-water oil and gas exploration in order to transport multiphase fluids—a complex mixture of water, gas, and oil—across long distances under challenging conditions. Significant technological challenges confront these systems, such as flow assurance, which ensures continuous fluid flow through pipelines, flowlines, and wells. Flow assurance issues can significantly impact production and incur costly downtime. This paper emphasizes the critical role of flow assurance analysis during the crucial Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) stage of SPS development. By utilizing industry-standard simulation tools like PIPESIM™, engineers can proactively identify and mitigate potential flow assurance problems that could hinder productivity. These analyses are crucial as FEED decisions significantly impact project cost-effectiveness. To illustrate the practical application of flow assurance principles, the paper presents a case study of a subsea architecture design for a specific manifold system. Considering operator requirements, flow assurance simulations were employed to guide critical decisions regarding material selection and optimal sizing of risers and flowlines. This demonstrates how flow assurance considerations during FEED directly influence cost-effective and optimized SPS design.

show abstract

Monitoring of Flow Assurance Solids in Oil and Gas Fields

Cited by 2 publications

References 56 publications

Understanding and controlling the nucleation and growth of metal–organic frameworks

Understanding and controlling the nucleation and growth of metal–organic frameworks

Flow assurance analysis in Front End Engineering Design (FEED) of Subsea Flowline and Riser

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About