2007
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a0587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of Gustatory Stimulation of Salivary Glands by Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging: Comparison of 1.5T and 3T

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to compare different field strengths monitoring physiologic changes due to oral stimulation of parotid glands by using diffusion-weighted (DW) echo-planar imaging (EPI).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
34
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previously published articles [10][11][14][15][19][20] of patients and healthy volunteers, the pattern of response to gustatory stimulation in DW-MRI and changes in the ADC as a result of RT to the salivary glands have varied considerably. The correlation between changes in ADC and clinical parameters, such as subjective xerostomia and absolute salivary flow rates remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In previously published articles [10][11][14][15][19][20] of patients and healthy volunteers, the pattern of response to gustatory stimulation in DW-MRI and changes in the ADC as a result of RT to the salivary glands have varied considerably. The correlation between changes in ADC and clinical parameters, such as subjective xerostomia and absolute salivary flow rates remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in an initial decrease and subsequent increase in the ADC values. Meanwhile, Habermann [20], Ries [10], Kato [11] -having used lemon juice as a stimulant -and Zhang [14] -who performed the gustatory stimulation with six tablets of 100 mg of ascorbic acid -reported an initial increase and subsequent fluctuation in the ADC values. This pattern of response to gustatory stimulation was also seen in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantages are improved signal-to-noise ratio by 30-50%, improved contrast-to-noise ratio by up to 96% and reduced variability in ADC and FA by 34-52%. [26][27][28] Disadvantages of imaging at 3 T include susceptibility artifact and image distortion; but this can be attenuated significantly by parallel imaging techniques, such as SENSE TM (sensitivity encoding). 26,28,29 Field strength should make no difference to the values of FA and ADC obtained, but should improve the accuracy and precision of those measurements.…”
Section: Mr Field Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,28,29 Field strength should make no difference to the values of FA and ADC obtained, but should improve the accuracy and precision of those measurements. 26,28,30 …”
Section: Mr Field Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%