2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13233-011-0610-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of injection molding of thermoplastics: Average solidification pressure as a key parameter for quality control

Abstract: The quality of the molded parts depends on the processing conditions, which creates a continuous demand for advanced techniques for monitoring and controlling the process. Temperature and pressure transducers are being used increasingly in industry. Therefore, the use of their measurements to obtain indications concerning the product quality could overcome the traditional resistance of industry to introduce new sensors in their production. The aim of this paper was to select a parameter, which can be identifie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values correspond to the back pressure in the hydraulic system. On the melt, the pressure was about 18 times larger . Being the gas pressure 100 bar, it was not possible to inject gas with back pressures higher than 5 bar (corresponding to about 90 bar on the melt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values correspond to the back pressure in the hydraulic system. On the melt, the pressure was about 18 times larger . Being the gas pressure 100 bar, it was not possible to inject gas with back pressures higher than 5 bar (corresponding to about 90 bar on the melt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer‐aided engineering (CAE) technology has found wide application in material selection, mold design, analysis of the part defects as well as optimization of the processing parameters for injection molding 4–7. Attention has been attracted to investigate the heat transfer during the injection moldings of crystalline polymers since early 1990s,8–10 because the quality and performance of molded parts depend heavily on the selection of operational variables11–15 during the molding process, especially in the cooling period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For amorphous polymers, it can be demonstrated [9] that, after the local solidification time t sol , the local pressure profile follows an exponential law, namely:…”
Section: From Pressure Measurements To Solidification Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it can be easily demonstrated [9] that even the complete pressure curve cannot be adopted as a suitable parameter to fully describe shrinkage, and a criterion based on the reproducibility of the pressure profiles can cause the rejection of parts that are consistent with quality parameters. On the other hand, the local average solidification pressure Ps (the average over the thickness of the pressures at which each layer solidifies locally) was demonstrated to be a suitable parameter for quality part description in the injection moulding process [9]. Determining the local average solidification pressure Ps requires the determination of both the local pressure history and the local solidification history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%