Monitoring of Leachate Migration in the Unsaturated Zonein the Vicinity of Sanitary Landfills

Cartwright, Keros; Schuller, Rudolph M.

doi:10.1111/j.1745-6592.1981.tb00817.x

Cited by 12 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…References n Na Barbarick et al (1979); ; ; Cai (2010); Debyle et al (1988); Geibe et al (2006); Goyne et al (2000); Grover and Lamborn (1970); Haines et al (1982); Hodson and Langan (1999); Johnson et al (1981); Jones and Edwards (1993); Kabala et al (2014); Kaplan et al (1996); Levett et al (1985); Magid and Christensen (1993); Maitre et al (1991); Manderscheid and Matzner (1995); Meesenburg et al (2004); Morrison (1982); Neary and Tomassini (1985); Oyarzún et al (2005); Parfitt et al (1997); Rais et al (2006); Ranger et al (2001); Raulund- Rasmussen (1989); Sharpe et al (1991); Sheppard et al (1992); Silkworth and Grigal (1981); Singh (2013); Spangenberg et al (1997); Szillery et al (2006); Watmough et al (2013); Wolff (1967) 33 K ; ; Cai (2010); Debyle et al (1988); Faber and Nelson (1984); Fernandez et al (1995); Geibe et al (2006); Goyne et al (2000); Grover and Lamborn (1970); Haines et al (1982); Hodson and Langan (...…”

Section: Analytesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…References n Pesticides Arthur et al (1998); Bergstrom and Shirmohammadi (1998); Bergström et al (2011);Ciglasch et al (2005); Fuhr et al (1998);Weihermüller (2005); Grundmann et al (2008); Hellpointner (1998); Jene et al (1999); Kasteel et al (2010); Klier et al (2008); Koskinen et al (1998);Perrin-Ganier et al (1993); Perrin-Ganier et al (1996); Pütz et al (1998); Ruggieri et al (2008); Schoen et al (1999); Schroll and Kühn (2004); Schroll et al (2008); Smith and Carsel (1986); Vereecken (2005); Vereecken and Dust (1998); Wessel-Bothe et al (2000) 23 Others# Bell (1974); Berglund et al (2010); Boll et al (1992); Brandi-Dohrn et al (1996b);Bredemeier et al (1990); Cho et al (2010); Czigány et al (2005); Dazzo and Rothwell (1974); Di et al (2009);Di and Cameron (2007); Duan et al (2010); Geibe et al (2006); Goyne et al (2000); Gui-Hua et al (2011);Holder et al (1991); Ilg et al (2007); Johnson et al (1981); Kaiser et al (2001)…”

Section: Analytesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(1992);;Cai (2010);Cho et al (2010);Faber and Nelson (1984);Geibe et al (2006);Goyne et al (2000);Haines et al (1982);Hendershot and Courchesne (1991);Hodson and Langan (1999);Hu et al (2007);Johnson et al (1981);Jones and Edwards (1993);Joslin et al (1987);Kabala et al (2014);Kaplan et al (1993);Kaplan et al (1996);Karnchanawong and Yongpisalpop (2009);Luster et al (2008);Magid and Christensen (1993);Manderscheid and Matzner (1995);Marchand et al (2011);Matzner et al (1998);Meesenburg et al (2004);Mizel et al (2015);Neary and Tomassini (1985);Oyarzún et al (2005);Parfitt et al (1997);Rafizul and Alamgir (2012);Rais et al (2006);Ranger et al (2001); Raulund-Rasmussen (1989);Schreffler and Sharpe (2003);Shaheen et al (2014);Sharpe et al (1991);Shepard et al (1990);Schreffler and Sharpe (2003);Sharpe et al (1991);Shepard et al (1990);Singh (2013);Spangenberg et al (1997);Starr (1985);Tischner et al (1998);…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Monitoring of Water and Solute Transport in the Vadose Zone: A Review

Singh

Kaur

Williard

et al. 2017

Vadose Zone Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Core Ideas Soil solution sampling is essential to better understand water and solute movement in soils. A review of different types of soil solution samplers is provided in this paper, including: drainage lysimeter or soil column, pan lysimeter, resin bags or membranes, wick lysimeters, suction cup, and suction plate. Recent developments, modifications, and recommendation criteria are provided for selecting appropriate soil solution extraction samplers. A number of contaminants including agrochemicals (fertilizers, pesticides), heavy metals, trace elements, and pathogenic microbes along with pharmaceuticals and hormones used in animal production move through the soil and are responsible for degradation of groundwater quality. Therefore, it is essential to sample soil solution for better understanding of movement and environmental fate of various contaminants in soils. We review different soil solution extraction samplers. The soil solution samplers discussed here are: drainage lysimeter or soil column, pan lysimeter, resin bags or membranes, wick lysimeters, suction cup, and suction plate. We have reviewed 304 journal articles representing a wide array of scientific disciplines. A brief history of soil solution monitoring and terminology used for describing various soil solution samplers is also provided. This review classifies literature on the basis of type of soil solution extraction samplers, soil type, land use–land cover (LULC), and analytes measured. Recommendation criteria are provided for selecting appropriate soil solution extraction samplers based on spatial and temporal variation, cost, soil type, amount of disturbance caused during installation of soil solution samplers, and monitoring of leachates involving different cations, anions, carbon, pH, EC, colloids, pesticides, and microbes. Use of advanced techniques with lysimeters for monitoring soil moisture content, soil water potential and flux is also discussed in this review.

show abstract

Section: Analytesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Analytesmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Monitoring of Water and Solute Transport in the Vadose Zone: A Review

Singh

Kaur

Williard

et al. 2017

Vadose Zone Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Les techniques d'échantillonnage varient selon les milieux. En zone non saturée, AGPAR et LANGMUIR (1971), GERHARDT (1S71) et JOHNSON et CARTWRIGHT (1980) ont utilisé des lysimètres à succion. Dans les dépôts imperméables, GOODALL et QUIGLEY (1977) ont procédé à un échantillonnage continu du sol sous la base des déchets et à l'extraction de l'eau interstitielle.…”

Section: Détermination Du Panache De Contaminationunclassified

Performance des lieux d'enfouissement sanitaire de Laterrière et de Ste-Sophie, Québec, Canada

Gélinas¹,

Locat²,

Drouin³

2005

rseau

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ce travail décrit les caractéristiques hydrogéologiques et chimiques de deux lieux d'enfouissement de déchets municipaux localisés au Québec. Le site de Laterrière est en opération depuis 1971 dans une ancienne sablière. Sous les dépôts meubles, la topographie du sotte rocheux est marquée par une vallée qui forme une limite imperméable à l'aquifère de sable et impose un écoulement convergent de l'eau souterraine vers la rivière Chicoutimi. Le site de Ste-Sophie, en opération depuis 1976, repose sur une couche de 3,5 mètres de sables fins saturés recouvrant un lit d'argile marine. La surélévation de la nappe dans les déchets favorise un écoulement divergent vers le périmètre de la zone d'enfouissement.Un réseau de piézomètres installé en bordure des deux sites a permis pendant trente mois de prélever des échantillons d'eau et de les analyser. Dans chaque panache de contamination, l'alcalinité, les ions majeurs Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl¯, le fer, le manganèse, l'azote total et ammoniacal, les DCO et DBO5 montrent des concentrations généralement supérieures à celles de L'eau naturelle ambiante. A proximité des deux Lieux d'enfouissement, les teneurs en cadmium, chrome, nickel et plomb excèdent les normes québécoises de potabiLité de l'eau. Dans chaque cas, ta distribution des contaminants est surtout régie par le réseau d'écoulement. La dispersion hydrodynamique et les réactions géochimiques dans le sous-sol sont des processus importants d'atténuation des contaminants.This paper describes the hydrogeological and geochemical features of two sanitary landfill sites located in the Province of Quebec : Laterriere and Ste-Sophie. The main objective is to evaluate the leachate attenuation performance of each site. For this project, the Quebec Ministry of the Environment chose two sites with contrasting hydrogeological settings.The Laterriere landfill, in operation since 1971, covers an area of about 32 ha. The refuse is deposited in an old sandpit and the landfill boundary is located 400 meters away from the Chicoutimi River, 25 meters above the stream water level. The bedrock topography shows a valley under the landfill which acts an an impervious base for the sand aquifer and induces a convergent groundwater flow towards the river.The Ste-Sophie landfill covers an area of 48 ha and began operating in 1976. The refuse zone is located on flat ground 350 meters away from the Ruisseau-aux-Castors. The refuse is deposited on a 3.5 meter layer of fine sands nearly saturated overlying a marine clay bed. A water table mound is observed beneath the landfill, resulting in diverging low lines outward from the center of the Landfill.For each site, the occurence and migration of contaminants was investigated using networks of piezometers. Sampling was performed monthly over a period of thirty months and thirty parameters were analyzed on each sample. The analytical results were entered in a database and treated by statistical methods.The shape of each contamination plume is controlled mainly by the groundwater flow system. At Laterrie...

show abstract

“…Chloride concentrations can be indicative of the leaching of waste materials from burial sites (Johnson and Cartwright, 1980;Freeze and Cherry, 1979, p. 436). Concentrations of chloride in lysimeter pore-water samples ranged from 0.1 to 73 mg/L and had a mean of 18 mg/L.…”

Section: Other Inorganic Constituentsmentioning

confidence: 99%