Monitoring of Mutual Investments in the CIS Countries - 2014

Alexey, K.; Yulia, B.; Yuri, D.; Anna, G.; Yuri, Krivonosov; Stepanova, Anastasia; Anna, M.; Anna, C.; Alexander, S.; Georgi, M.

doi:10.2139/ssrn.2524050

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…National statistics on FDI, especially in transition economies, are extremely unreliable due to using 'offshore' facilities (Kalotay et al, 2014), a lack of accounting on small investment projects, as well as reinvested profits and some other points leading to the distortions (Kuznetsov et al, 2013). Most of these are found for the Visegrad group.…”

Section: Methods For Comparison Of Statistical Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This methodology includes analysis of both Russian and a partner's 'mirror' central banks statistics, comparing it with the data from other official sources (e.g. data from ministries of the economy or state investment agencies), international organizations (mainly UNCTAD statistics as well as OECD data which usually excludes investment to financial holdings) and -the most important -the data on particular FDI projects which can be found in corporate reports, press and industry overviews specifically collected (see details in Kuznetsov et al, 2013).…”

Section: Methods For Comparison Of Statistical Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Geography of FDI from Visegrad Countries in Russia

Кузнецов

Nevskaya

2017

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The article investigates the Russian place in outward FDI geography of the Visegrad countries. The role of the neighborhood effect is shown. With the help of the authors' special methodology for FDI calculations which overcomes deficiencies in the Bank of Russia's statistics, the distribution of the Visegrad group's FDI between Russian regions is studied. The authors demonstrate the presence of a hierarchical-wave model of spatial diffusion of FDI by investors in retail and banking. At the same time, it is found that Moscow and its surrounding dominate the recipient regions. It is also shown that Visegrad group investments in Russia are mostly made by enterprises which remove any political component. As a result, their FDI expansion to the Russian market is likely to continue as soon as the Russian economy returns to growth.

show abstract

Section: Methods For Comparison Of Statistical Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methods For Comparison Of Statistical Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geography of FDI from Visegrad Countries in Russia

Кузнецов

Nevskaya

2017

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The role of foreign capital in the economies of regions of Russia: Possibilities of assessments and interregional differences

Кузнецова

2016

Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

FDI in the Post-Soviet Space Three Decades after the Disintegration of the Soviet Union

Kalotay

Sulstarova

2021

Kontury glob. transform.: polit. èkon. pravo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The former Soviet Union disintegrated three decades ago. That momentous 1991 was not only the starting point for independence of the countries of the post-Soviet space but also the starting point for their transformation from centrally planned economy to capitalism, often with local specificities. At the moment of writing this article aiming at analysing the long-term, structural characteristics of inward and outward foreign direct investment (FDI), these 12 economies are facing new COVID-19-related challenges, different from the problems of transformation undertaken in the past decades. After a brief literature survey, in which the main issues raised by academic research are highlighted, the article analyses the long-term trends and the main characteristics (geographical and sectoral) of FDI, with special reference to greenfield project announcements from 2003 on (the starting year of data availability). It also explores how much economic development was based on either attracting inward or promoting outward FDI or both. The performance of the 12 post-Soviet economies is controlled against the performance of other transition economies such as the Baltic States, South-East Europe and/or the Visegrad Group. The article concludes that indeed efforts towards using inward or outward FDI for development has been modest, even if in inflows one can observe some convergence with the other transition economies, which have been relying more wittingly using FDI for their development.

show abstract

Monitoring of Mutual Investments in the CIS Countries - 2014

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

Geography of FDI from Visegrad Countries in Russia

Geography of FDI from Visegrad Countries in Russia

The role of foreign capital in the economies of regions of Russia: Possibilities of assessments and interregional differences

FDI in the Post-Soviet Space Three Decades after the Disintegration of the Soviet Union

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About