2018
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-923-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of Progressive Damage in Buildings Using Laser Scan Data

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Vulnerability of buildings to natural and man-induced hazards has become a main concern for our society. Ensuring their serviceability, safety and sustainability is of vital importance and the main reason for setting up monitoring systems to detect damages at an early stage. In this work, a method is presented for detecting changes from laser scan data, where no registration between different epochs is needed. To show the potential of the method, a case study of a laboratory test carried out at the St… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By creating a 3D reference surface model from the points, rather than trying to detect deformation by single-point comparison, surface change is measured as the distance along the local surface normal [29,30]. Limitations of this approach include: (1) a specific surface model is needed for different applications with objects of specific geometric characteristics, Puente et al [31] detected damage on planar masonry walls by measuring cloud-to-plane distances between repeated laser scanning data and were able to detect changes at the noise level of individual laser scanner observations while avoiding 3D point cloud registration; (2) when deformation is derived by computing the differences between surface models fitted to different epochs, the estimated deformation field is basically one-dimensional [32,33]; (3) cloud-to-mesh approaches do not take into account the local orientation of the surface represented by the PCs [27]; and (4) meshing TLS data not only adds a level of error by interpolation, but can also create erroneous surfaces [22]. Additionally, meshing PCs have severe limitations specially for sophisticated historic structures presenting roughness at all scales [34].…”
Section: Limitations Of Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By creating a 3D reference surface model from the points, rather than trying to detect deformation by single-point comparison, surface change is measured as the distance along the local surface normal [29,30]. Limitations of this approach include: (1) a specific surface model is needed for different applications with objects of specific geometric characteristics, Puente et al [31] detected damage on planar masonry walls by measuring cloud-to-plane distances between repeated laser scanning data and were able to detect changes at the noise level of individual laser scanner observations while avoiding 3D point cloud registration; (2) when deformation is derived by computing the differences between surface models fitted to different epochs, the estimated deformation field is basically one-dimensional [32,33]; (3) cloud-to-mesh approaches do not take into account the local orientation of the surface represented by the PCs [27]; and (4) meshing TLS data not only adds a level of error by interpolation, but can also create erroneous surfaces [22]. Additionally, meshing PCs have severe limitations specially for sophisticated historic structures presenting roughness at all scales [34].…”
Section: Limitations Of Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of its applicability range from large civil infrastructures such as dams [1][2][3] or bridges [4][5][6]-even in a dynamic loading scenarios [7,8]-to laboratory specimens [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Within this context, the laser scanning technology is placed as the most used remote sensing approach [1][2][3]5,9,13] as it can directly provide high-density three-dimensional (3D) data in the form of point clouds. Through the use of these sensors, it is possible to evaluate the deformation suffered by a structure by means of different change detection methods, such as the radial basis approach [3,18], the plane-fitting method [9], or the curve-fitting strategy [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this context, the laser scanning technology is placed as the most used remote sensing approach [1][2][3]5,9,13] as it can directly provide high-density three-dimensional (3D) data in the form of point clouds. Through the use of these sensors, it is possible to evaluate the deformation suffered by a structure by means of different change detection methods, such as the radial basis approach [3,18], the plane-fitting method [9], or the curve-fitting strategy [19]. These approaches exploit data redundancy, providing better accuracy than the single-point measurement [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations