1984
DOI: 10.1080/07060668409501578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of volatiles: A technique for detection of soft rot (Erwinia carotovora) in potato tubers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, they were not considered to be significant as potential marker volatiles for a soft-rot detection system, even though ethanol was previously identified as one of the most significant vapours when E. carotovora infection occurs. Concentrations were shown to rise by as much as 2000 times with infection (Waterer & Pritchard, 1984), whilst other alcohols such as propan-1-ol remain at relatively constant levels. Other volatiles are less well documented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For this reason, they were not considered to be significant as potential marker volatiles for a soft-rot detection system, even though ethanol was previously identified as one of the most significant vapours when E. carotovora infection occurs. Concentrations were shown to rise by as much as 2000 times with infection (Waterer & Pritchard, 1984), whilst other alcohols such as propan-1-ol remain at relatively constant levels. Other volatiles are less well documented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary work and that of other workers showed ethanol, methanol and acetaldehyde to be present with both infected and uninfected potato tubers (Waterer & Pritchard, 1984). For this reason, they were not considered to be significant as potential marker volatiles for a soft-rot detection system, even though ethanol was previously identified as one of the most significant vapours when E. carotovora infection occurs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, there is a good correlation between the smell of potatoes and its degree of damage. The potato disease can be detected firstly by its volatile gas concentration and thus, the disease degree can be recognized [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Stinson et al proposed a healthy recognition ability of the disease in potato by an electronic nose [16]; however, the technology required further research; DE Lacy Costello et al designed an electronic nose system, which could detect diseased potatoes within healthy potatoes [17]; however, https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2017-0044…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%