2018
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201701220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring Potential‐Induced DNA Dehybridization Kinetics for Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Detection by using In Situ Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering

Abstract: Changes in temperature, ionic strength or electrical field are generally employed to dehybridize double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA). In contrast, we propose potential‐induced dsDNA dehybridization to distinguish fully matched target DNA (tDNA) from tDNA with a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) by following their dehybridization kinetics through in situ surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). The determination of the potential that evokes notable dehybridization of dsDNA without causing any desorption of the immo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found a direct correlation between melting potential and thermal stability, where 9 mV shift in the melting potential corresponds to 1 °C change in melting temperature [52] . Schuhmann and coworkers employed potential ramps on dye‐labeled ssDNA layers to investigate the integrity of the ssDNA/mercaptohexanol (MCH) modified electrodes and focused on retaining the stability of the sensing layer [53] . By comparing dehybridization and desorption curves of ds‐ and ssDNA layers, respectively, they determined that a single dehybridization potential is sufficient to induce dsDNA dehybridization without desorbing the immobilized ssDNA from the electrode surface (Figure 8).…”
Section: It Takes Two To Tango: How the Interfacial Electric Field Ca...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found a direct correlation between melting potential and thermal stability, where 9 mV shift in the melting potential corresponds to 1 °C change in melting temperature [52] . Schuhmann and coworkers employed potential ramps on dye‐labeled ssDNA layers to investigate the integrity of the ssDNA/mercaptohexanol (MCH) modified electrodes and focused on retaining the stability of the sensing layer [53] . By comparing dehybridization and desorption curves of ds‐ and ssDNA layers, respectively, they determined that a single dehybridization potential is sufficient to induce dsDNA dehybridization without desorbing the immobilized ssDNA from the electrode surface (Figure 8).…”
Section: It Takes Two To Tango: How the Interfacial Electric Field Ca...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in situ SERS measurements allow for the fast and efficient (on the timescale of minutes) detection of single nucleotide polymorphism based on potential‐assisted dehybridization of target dsDNA [77] …”
Section: Dna Rna and Conformational Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schuhmann et al also employed SERS detection on nanostructured gold electrodes to detect single mismatches in DNA using both constant potential and scanning potential melt routines. 63 Targets were labeled with the Cy3 dye, and probe densities of 2 ´10 12 −3 10 12 molecules cm −2 were employed. Melts were carried out in 10 mM phosphate buffer containing 450 mM K 2 SO 4 .…”
Section: Electrochemical Melting Of Dna Monolayersmentioning
confidence: 99%