2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring rapid vegetation succession in estuarine wetland using time series MODIS-based indicators: An application in the Yangtze River Delta area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
62
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
62
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually no land use/cover type has shown a noticeable domination over others, except for cumulated four months precipitation where agricultural area shows higher performance in the four stations. The comparison of the four stations shows a difference in coefficient of Pearson within the same land use/cover class; this could be due to several factors, such as difference in soil moisture [14], plant community [36], anthropogenic activities and vegetation phenology [37][38][39]. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).…”
Section: Ndvi As Lulc Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Actually no land use/cover type has shown a noticeable domination over others, except for cumulated four months precipitation where agricultural area shows higher performance in the four stations. The comparison of the four stations shows a difference in coefficient of Pearson within the same land use/cover class; this could be due to several factors, such as difference in soil moisture [14], plant community [36], anthropogenic activities and vegetation phenology [37][38][39]. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).…”
Section: Ndvi As Lulc Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned by Li et al [19], estimating vegetation dynamics from NDVI or EVI is not a straightforward achievement. Although in this work quality assessment was done on the MOD13Q1 product to eliminate noises, other factors, such as plant community [36], anthropogenic perturbation, vegetation phenology and sensor conditions [38][39][40], may influence the temporal dynamics of the two indices and their response to rainfall. Figure 5 shows that NDVI and EVI are strongly correlated for all land use/covers with Pearson's coefficient value ranging from 0.976 to 0.984.…”
Section: Evi As Lulc Indicator and Comparative Analysis With Ndvimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When underlying mechanisms in an ecosystem are known, we have greater clarity about which parameters caused system fragility. For instance, vegetation and water are both the key variables characterizing wetlands [45]. The index that was suggested to provide the most reliable indicator (MVWR) is also a combination of vegetation and water cover information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses the information content of four spectral bands (green, red, NIR and SWIR), and therefore, it potentially contains more information about the wetland's physical status. It has been argued that an index based on combining vegetation and water may reflect a wetland ecosystem functioning more efficiently than either vegetation or water index alone [45]. The new index we propose is based on an existing composite index called the Vegetation Water Ratio (VWR).…”
Section: Spectral Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation