2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring Rarity: The Critically Endangered Saharan Cheetah as a Flagship Species for a Threatened Ecosystem

Abstract: Deserts are particularly vulnerable to human impacts and have already suffered a substantial loss of biodiversity. In harsh and variable desert environments, large herbivores typically occur at low densities, and their large carnivore predators occur at even lower densities. The continued survival of large carnivores is key to healthy functioning desert ecosystems, and the ability to gather reliable information on these rare low density species, including presence, abundance and density, is critical to their m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is one of the most wide-ranging carnivores, with home ranges documented in excess of 3,000 km 2 (10, 11) and movements of translocated animals exceeding 1,000 km (11). However, densities seldom exceed 0.02/km 2 and have been recorded as low as 0.0002/km 2 (12). Historically widespread across Africa and southwestern Asia, cheetah are now known to occur in only 9% of their past distributional range (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is one of the most wide-ranging carnivores, with home ranges documented in excess of 3,000 km 2 (10, 11) and movements of translocated animals exceeding 1,000 km (11). However, densities seldom exceed 0.02/km 2 and have been recorded as low as 0.0002/km 2 (12). Historically widespread across Africa and southwestern Asia, cheetah are now known to occur in only 9% of their past distributional range (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify habitat patches with minimum areas capable of sustaining cheetahs, we focused on patches larger than 1,700 km 2 . We selected this threshold value based on preliminary telemetry results (H. Jowkar, personal communication, 2007) and the estimated mean home‐range size of the Saharan cheetah, a subspecies living in a comparable arid ecosystem (i.e., 1,583 km 2 ; Belbachir et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such precision has not yet been recorded in closed capture–recapture studies with cheetahs. For example, two studies using the heterogeneity M h model in CAPTURE recorded an abundance estimate of seven males with a SE of 1.93 and a range of 6–14 males in South Africa (Marnewick, Funston, & Karanth, ) or an abundance estimate of five males with a SE of 1.36 and a range of 5–11 males in Algeria (Belbachir, Pettorelli, Wacher, Belbachir‐bazi, & Durant, ). The precision of abundance estimates as in our study, coupled with the accuracy of abundance estimates, is an obvious and important advantage of spatial tactic and mixture models in MARK, over the traditionally used heterogeneity M h model in CAPTURE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%