2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring Renal Function: A Prospective Study Comparing Camera-Based Technetium-99m Mercaptoacetyltriglycine Clearance and Creatinine Clearance

Abstract: The results of this study have demonstrated that MAG3 clearance obtained using a camera-based technique shows greater precision than the conventional creatinine clearance and is superior to the conventional creatinine clearance for monitoring changes in renal function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 The creatinine clearance as a measure of Glomerular filtration rate suffers from a lack of accuracy and poor precision. 3,33,34 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 The creatinine clearance as a measure of Glomerular filtration rate suffers from a lack of accuracy and poor precision. 3,33,34 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, efficacy of dynamic renography radiopharmaceuticals such as 99m Tc-mercaptotriglycylglycine or 99m Tcdiethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid is not investigated. 99m Tc-mercaptotriglycylglycine clearance is reported to parallel creatinine clearance [11] or to be superior to the conventional creatinine clearance for monitoring changes in renal function [12] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage injected dose is converted to a clearance measurement using a validated nomogram (67). Camera-based clearances appear to be reproducible and are superior to creatinine clearance for monitoring changes in renal function (68). Although camera-based clearances are considered to be less accurate than plasma sample clearances (3), they avoid sources of error (timing of plasma samples, correction for radioactive decay, dilution of standards, pipetting small volumes) inherent in plasma sample techniques.…”
Section: Quantitative Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%