2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring salivary lamotrigine concentrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…64 In specimens collected $2 hours after ingestion, there was a close correlation in each individual between the concentrations in stimulated and unstimulated saliva, which were similar. 64 In specimens collected $2 hours after ingestion, there was a close correlation in each individual between the concentrations in stimulated and unstimulated saliva, which were similar.…”
Section: Saliva Tdm For Lamotriginementioning
confidence: 63%
“…64 In specimens collected $2 hours after ingestion, there was a close correlation in each individual between the concentrations in stimulated and unstimulated saliva, which were similar. 64 In specimens collected $2 hours after ingestion, there was a close correlation in each individual between the concentrations in stimulated and unstimulated saliva, which were similar.…”
Section: Saliva Tdm For Lamotriginementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Lamotrigine distributes into saliva, with salivary lamotrigine concentrations being on average approximately 0.4–0.5 that of serum concentrations in patients receiving chronic lamotrigine therapy. Salivary lamotrigine concentrations correlate well with those in serum, which makes saliva an alternative sample to perform TDM [83,84]. The parent drug is extensively metabolized, mainly by glucuronidation to an inactive metabolite [85].…”
Section: Lamotriginementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, pill count may not be accurate in estimating adherence; it tends to overestimate medication adherence and yield an imprecise metric of the total dose taken (Farmer, 1999; Haynes, Ackloo, Sahota, McDonald, & Yao, 2008; McDonald, Garg, & Haynes, 2002; Pullar, Kumar, Tindall, & Feely, 1989). A biological measure, derived from blood, saliva, or urine concentrations of medication, is generally considered to be the most accurate measure of adherence and is commonly used in other research fields such as epilepsy (Dutta & Reed, 2006; Herkes & Eadie, 1990; Landmark, Rytter, & Johannessen, 2007; Malone, Eadie, Addison, Wright, & Dickinson, 2006; Mitchell, Scheier, & Baker, 2000; Specht, Elsner, May, Schimichowski, & Thorbecke, 2003; Vermeire, Hearnshaw, Van Royen, & Denekens, 2001; Williams et al, 2001). Given varenicline’s pharmacokinetic attributes such as minimal metabolism and long half-life (approximately 24 hours) (Faessel et al, 2010), assessment of varenicline is a valid method for biologically assessing varenicline adherence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%