2006
DOI: 10.1080/01431160600851793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring snowmelt across the Arctic forest–tundra ecotone using Synthetic Aperture Radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Visttasvággi, the vegetation includes taller vegetation such as birches. When the radar encounters elements like tree trunks, leaves, and branches within a forest canopy, it experiences double bounce and volume scattering, typically resulting in higher backscatter [39]. The method used in this paper may be particularly effective for studying the snowmelt in areas without significant tree height variations due to the distinctive values obtained in such an environment.…”
Section: Variation In Backscattering and Spring Snowmeltmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Visttasvággi, the vegetation includes taller vegetation such as birches. When the radar encounters elements like tree trunks, leaves, and branches within a forest canopy, it experiences double bounce and volume scattering, typically resulting in higher backscatter [39]. The method used in this paper may be particularly effective for studying the snowmelt in areas without significant tree height variations due to the distinctive values obtained in such an environment.…”
Section: Variation In Backscattering and Spring Snowmeltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sentinel-1 (S-1) SAR offers a 6-day revisit time at the equator, with 2 satellites in a 12-day orbit and a spatial resolution of around 20 m before speckle filtering [34]. Previous studies have used the SAR backscatter coefficient to measure the snowmelt and to generate snow cover maps [35][36][37], monitor snow wetness [38] and assess the relationship between the spring snowmelt and tundra vegetation changes [17,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many models developed over the last 15 years have been validated in various environments, including mountainous terrain and glaciers [2][3][4], sea ice and ice sheets [5][6][7][8], agricultural fields [9,10], boreal forest [11][12][13][14][15][16], and forest-tundra ecotones [17]. The ability of SAR to discriminate snow-free from wet or dry snow-covered surfaces has been investigated substantially more than its potential for estimating the snow mass of dry snow cover; this is particularly true near the Arctic treeline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%